BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

|X| and |Y|

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: |X| and |Y|

by logitech » Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:24 pm
canuckclint wrote:If x and y are non-zero integers and |x| + |y| = 32, what is xy?

(1) -4x – 12y = 0

(2) |x| – |y| = 16
(1) -4x – 12y = 0

-4x = 12y

x=-3y This tells us X and Y have different signs. ( -,+)

we can also say |x| = 3|y|

Using this and |x| + |y| = 32,

We can find that |x| = 24 an |y| = 8

we don't know which one is NEGATIVE and which one is positive but since we know that they have different signs...xy= - 192

Hence statement is SUFFICIENT

(2) |x| – |y| = 16

Using |x| + |y| = 32, we can find that |x| = 24 an |y| = 8

But we have no information given for their signs so xy can be either - 192 or +192

So this tricky statement is INSUFFICIENT

IMO the answer should be A
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:48 pm
I agree with logitech solution
IMO answer is A
Can you plz. confirm OA
Join the discussion

Re: |X| and |Y|

by abcdefg » Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:33 pm
OA is A .

Just out of curiosity, why is it that we can make x=-3y into |x| = 3|y| ?

logitech wrote:
canuckclint wrote:If x and y are non-zero integers and |x| + |y| = 32, what is xy?

(1) -4x – 12y = 0

(2) |x| – |y| = 16
(1) -4x – 12y = 0

-4x = 12y

x=-3y This tells us X and Y have different signs. ( -,+)

we can also say |x| = 3|y|

Using this and |x| + |y| = 32,

We can find that |x| = 24 an |y| = 8

we don't know which one is NEGATIVE and which one is positive but since we know that they have different signs...xy= - 192

Hence statement is SUFFICIENT

(2) |x| – |y| = 16

Using |x| + |y| = 32, we can find that |x| = 24 an |y| = 8

But we have no information given for their signs so xy can be either - 192 or +192

So this tricky statement is INSUFFICIENT

IMO the answer should be A
Join the discussion

by rah_pandey » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:23 pm
This is a property of nos
if ax=by
than
|ax|=|by|

if you ask why did we convert to mod than answer is simple, since the original equation is in modular form so it makes sense to convert the second also into modular form and solve.
Join the discussion