BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

integers

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: integers

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:23 am
ketkoag wrote:Integers 9, 11, x, y, 17 are consecutive. Y=?
1) x is odd
2) y is odd
Hi!

What's the source of this question? Normally when we discuss "consecutive integers", we specifically mean sets such as {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.

The word "consecutive" doesn't always mean "consecutive integers"; for example, we could discuss "consecutive odd numbers" or "consecutive multiples or 4".

That said, the only way this question makes sense is if our set is {9, 11, 13, 15, 17} and we are in fact looking at consecutive odd integers.

So, the question really is:

If x and y make up the set {13, 15}, which is which?

(1) x is odd. Could be 13 or 15... insufficient.

(2) y is odd. Could be 13 or 15... insufficient.

Combining: still no clue which is 13 and which is 15: insufficient, choose (E).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by david2008 » Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:37 pm
What is the OA?

It would have to be E if we can't assume the set is written in order but if it is written in order then shouldn't it be C?
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:28 pm
david2008 wrote:What is the OA?

It would have to be E if we can't assume the set is written in order but if it is written in order then shouldn't it be C?
If it's written in order, then we can answer without the statements; therefore, it can't be written in order.

In data sufficiency, the original information itself will never be sufficient to answer the question (there's no answer choice that says "the question can be answered without any additional information").
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by ket » Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:44 am
IMHO I think it is C

if I were solving this problem on exam I would understand the problem as as - 9<11<x<y<17... i.e. numbers are placed in order...

(1) - could be 13 or 15
(2) - could be 13 or 15

combined it y must be 15 because x<y

If I am correct Stuart thinks the problem asks for 'consecutive odd integers' and plus assumes that the numbers are not placed in the way of order... Is this assumption justified? I mean the problem doesn't really mention the word 'odd' , while I think that assumption that values are placed in order is justified...

I think so well because, if the problem was written something like this: the Set (9,11,x,y,17) contains consecutive integers... then I would not assume the order... but the way the question is put I think the order is assumed....

It would be great to hear OA from Ketkoag :)
Join the discussion

by bizwizashish » Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:54 am
OA ?

I guess it's fair to assume that numbers are written in order.... atleast the wording suggests so...

would really be interested in knowing the OA
Regards,
Ashish Khandelwal
Join the discussion

Re: integers

by The GMAT Chef » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:06 am
ketkoag wrote:Integers 9, 11, x, y, 17 are consecutive. Y=?
1) x is odd
2) y is odd
Hi,
Wherever this question is from, it's not of the GMAT type.

Two issues

First issue:

As Stuart pointed out, when the term "consecutive integers" is used, it is understood that the integers are consecutive by 1. Otherwise, we say consecutive odd, consecutive even, consecutive by ten, etc...

Consecutive integers are just an example of an arithmetic progression (sequence) in which the constant R (the difference between two consecutive terms) is equal to 1.
For consecutive odd integers, R = 2.
For consecutive even integers, R = 2 as well.

So, the question will only make sense if the integers are consecutive odd.
But then, we don't need statements 1 or 2 and the question does no longer qualify as a GMAT DS question.

Second issue.

In the stem,

a)If we were told that the list was ordered, we could answer the questions without the statements: y = 15

b)Likewise, if we were told that the list was unordered, we could answer the questions without the statements: y = 13

Neither case is acceptable in the GMAT DS format as Suart judiciously pointed out.

The real issue is not knowing whether the list is ordered.

For this reason, the correct answer could be any choice depending upon what the statements are.

This may be trivial but a pair of statements could be:
1) the integers are not necessarily in order
2) x - y = -2

Answer: B (y= 15)
Dakar Azu is The GMAT Chef. He has sweet recipes for virtually every type of GMAT question, be it quantitative or verbal. Dakar has been teaching the GMAT since 2003 and is the founder of GMATLounge at https://gmatlounge.com , 700-GMAT Club at https://700gmatclub.com ,
and GMATVideos at https://gmatvideos.com .
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:15 pm
ketkoag-whats the source?
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:09 pm
Sorry for the delay..
OA: E
it is from a set of math questions from a internet site for math practice..
Join the discussion