BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sum of even numbers

Expert replies
by muna_m » Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:16 pm
The sum of the even numbers between 1 and n is 79*80, where n is an odd number, then n=?

I know we can solve it using AP. But, I approached it using no. of terms & average and was stuck.

No. of terms (even) = (n-1-2)/2 = (n-1)/2 terms

Average = (2+n-1)/2 = (n+1)/2

Thus,Sum = No of terms * Avg
79 * 80 = (n-1)/2 * (n+1)/2
79 * 80 * 4 = n^2 - 1

And solving for n seems hard. Where did i go wrong?! Isn't this method viable for this question?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by shanmugam.d » Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:18 am
Hi, it can be solved as follows:

Since n is an odd number, let us represent it as n = 2m + 1

so the summation of all even numbers from 1 to n can be written as

2 + 4 + 6 + .... + 2m
= 2 * (1 + 2 + 3 + .... + m)
= 2 * (m*(m+ 1))/2
= m * (m+1)
= 79 *80

Therefore m = 79

n= 2m + 1 = 2*79 + 1 = 159
Join the discussion

by muna_m » Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:08 pm
The OA 79

I got 159 too using my method so was wondering where i went wrong..
Join the discussion

by zenithexe » Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:41 am
Hey, I think its typo (if that's ever possible)

if you use the answer value to calculate the sum it will be 19.5*80, maybe the typer got confused?
Join the discussion

sum of even series

by ksb214 » Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:13 am
use formula for arithmatic progression

Sum = n(2a + (n-1)d )/2

a = first term
d= difference between consecutive numbers

here a = 2 and d = 2

sum = n(2*2 + (n-1)*2)/2
sum = n(2+2n)/2
sum = n(n+1) = 79*(80)

Hence n = 79
Join the discussion

by zenithexe » Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:58 pm
Hey, Thanks for the input.

though, the "n" found on your solution mean's 'n'th number of the sequence, not the actual n asked in the question.

so n=79 means 79th number of sequence 2,4,6,8,....

which means the actual n asked in the question would be n=2*79+1=158+1 or 159



I think that's maybe where the writer got confused too, or maybe we're missing some info on the question.
Thanks for mentioning the arithmatic progression I didn't know that formula until now.

PS.To be honest, I actually used excel to confirm that 159 is indeed the correct answer.
Join the discussion