BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

value of x is closest to which integer?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Vemuri wrote:The numbers x and y are not integers. The value of x is closest to which integer?

1. 4 is the integer that is closest to x+y
2. 1 is the integer that is closest to x-y
Statement 1: 4 is the integer that is closest to x+y

this essentially means (x+y) can be anywhere between 3.5 and 4.5. We can represent this as an inequality:

3.5 < x + y < 4.5

we have no info on y, so insufficient.

Statement 2: 1 is the integer that is closest to x-y

Again, this can be represented in the form of an inequality:

0.5 < x - y < 1.5

here too we do not know anything about y, hence insufficient.

Both statements together:

3.5 < x + y < 4.5
0.5 < x - y < 1.5

add both inequalities:

3.5 + 0.5 < x + y + x - y < 4.5 + 1.5
4 < 2x < 6
2 < x < 3

x can be anywhere between 2 and 3. If x is 2.1, the nearest integer would be 2 and if x is 2.7, the nearest integer would be 3. Insufficient.

Choose E.

-BM-
Join the discussion

Re: value of x is closest to which integer?

by Vemuri » Wed May 06, 2009 2:38 am
bluementor wrote:
Vemuri wrote:The numbers x and y are not integers. The value of x is closest to which integer?

1. 4 is the integer that is closest to x+y
2. 1 is the integer that is closest to x-y
Statement 1: 4 is the integer that is closest to x+y

this essentially means (x+y) can be anywhere between 3.5 and 4.5. We can represent this as an inequality:

3.5 < x + y < 4.5

we have no info on y, so insufficient.

Statement 2: 1 is the integer that is closest to x-y

Again, this can be represented in the form of an inequality:

0.5 < x - y < 1.5

here too we do not know anything about y, hence insufficient.

Both statements together:

3.5 < x + y < 4.5
0.5 < x - y < 1.5

add both inequalities:

3.5 + 0.5 < x + y + x - y < 4.5 + 1.5
4 < 2x < 6
2 < x < 3

x can be anywhere between 2 and 3. If x is 2.1, the nearest integer would be 2 and if x is 2.7, the nearest integer would be 3. Insufficient.

Choose E.

-BM-
Cool explanation
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:19 am
it shouldn't take too long for you to conclude that the individual statements are insufficient.

statement 1 means that 3.5 < x + y < 4.5
this of course doesn't tell us anything about the sizes of x and y.
for instance, x and y could be 1.5 and 2.5. or, they could be -999.5 and 1003.5.
insufficient by itself.

--

statement 2 means that 0.5 < x - y < 1.5
this likewise tells us nothing about the individual values of x and y.
for instance, x and y could be 2.5 and 1.5. or, they could be 1001.5 and 1000.5.
insufficient by itself.

--

together, you can ADD THE INEQUALITIES, so that 'y' cancels out.
(TAKEAWAY: you can add inequalities whenever the 'alligators' - i.e., the "<" or ">" - face the SAME WAY.)
this gives
3.5 < x + y < 4.5
0.5 < x - y < 1.5
add
4 < 2x < 6
therefore
2 < x < 3

this is still insufficient, because x could be closer to 2, closer to 3, or neither (if it's exactly in the middle, at 2.5).

ans (e).

--

you could also just LOOK FOR SPECIFIC NUMBERS that satisfy the criteria in the problem. for instance, x = 2.7 and y = 1.5 satisfy both statements, making x closest to 3. also, x = 2.3 and y = 1.5 satisfy both statements, making x closest to 2.
so, both statements together are still insufficient, so, (e).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion