BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Few DS ...Plz discuss

Expert replies
by electrico » Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:33 am
1. If n and k are positive integers, is SQRT(n+k) > 2 SQRT(n)
(1) k > 3n
(2) n + k > 3n

2. Is the integer n a multiple of 15?
(1) n is a multiple of 20.
(2) n + 6 is a multiple of 3.

3. In a certain coding scheme, each word is encoded by replacing each letter in the word with another letter. The same code is used for all words, so that the same letter replaces a given letter each time the given letter occurs. What code will result when the word TAME is encoded by this scheme?
(1) When the word MAT is encoded, the result is DLX.
(2) When the word TEA is encoded, the result is XRL.

4. If d denotes a decimal, is d ≥ 0.5 ?
(1) When d is rounded to the nearest tenth, the result is 0.5.
(2) When d is rounded to the nearest integer, the result is 1.


My Answers are:

1. - E
2. - C
3. - C
4. - A

But I saw some differents answers for these question.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by electrico » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:03 pm
Is it really tough or its just that nobody cares here!!!
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:27 pm
@ electrico,
To get better discussion, pls dont post multiple quesitions in a single post.

I will try to answer.. as much as I can.. hang on.
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:41 pm
answers for 1 and 2 with explanation:

question 1:
case 1:we know (and now you know:) for any two numbers n and k both >2
nk>n+k
sqrt(nk)>sq(n+k)
now k>3n so it is atleast 4
2sqrt(n)>sq(n=k) suficient
case 2: take sqrt on both sides
sqrt(n+k)>sq(3n)
now, in this case we are not sure if sqrt(n+k) >2sqrt(n)
so A

question 2

case A: take 60 and 40
case 2: take 12 and 15

answer E- both insufficient

let me work on the other two..and plz post different under different thread.
Last edited by tohellandback on Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:49 pm
questions 3,
answers C,A

Explanation for 3
combine both and you get values for all the letters inTAME

explanation 4:
1) the number must be >=o.5 and <.6
so sufficient
2) number could be anything from 0.0 to 0.999999..
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by electrico » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:57 am
@tohellandback
question 1:
case 1:we know (and now you know:) for any two numbers n and k both >2
nk>n+k
sqrt(nk)>sq(n+k)
now k>3n so it is atleast 4
2sqrt(n)>sq(n=k) suficient
case 2: take sqrt on both sides
sqrt(n+k)>sq(3n)
now, in this case we are not sure if sqrt(n+k) >2sqrt(n)
so A

question 2

case A: take 60 and 40
case 2: take 12 and 15

answer E- both insufficient
---------------
For Q1. k > 3n => k+n > 4n => sqrt(k+n) > 2 sqrt(n)
But this will hold true only if we will consider the +ve square root. what if one is +ve and the other is -ve. (although agreed to your explanation. Thanks.)

For Q2.
case A: take 60 and 40
case 2: take 12 and 15 , and also 60.

combining both will give answer C. correct me if I am wrong?
Join the discussion

by electrico » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:01 am
Q3 and Q4 I also got it correct...but saw some other answers so thought of confirming. Thanks for that.
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:22 am
electrico wrote:@tohellandback
question 1:
case 1:we know (and now you know:) for any two numbers n and k both >2
nk>n+k
sqrt(nk)>sq(n+k)
now k>3n so it is atleast 4
2sqrt(n)>sq(n=k) suficient
case 2: take sqrt on both sides
sqrt(n+k)>sq(3n)
now, in this case we are not sure if sqrt(n+k) >2sqrt(n)
so A

question 2

case A: take 60 and 40
case 2: take 12 and 15

answer E- both insufficient
---------------
For Q1. k > 3n => k+n > 4n => sqrt(k+n) > 2 sqrt(n)
But this will hold true only if we will consider the +ve square root. what if one is +ve and the other is -ve. (although agreed to your explanation. Thanks.)

For Q2.
case A: take 60 and 40
case 2: take 12 and 15 , and also 60.

combining both will give answer C. correct me if I am wrong?
Electricio: I think yuo are right..
silly mistake sorry
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by electrico » Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:08 am
Means both my explanation are correct?

Can somebody suggets other explanation which lead to diff. answwrs?

Thanks tohellandback.
Join the discussion

by gmat_dest » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:27 am
1. A
2. C
3. C
4. B

1 and 2 are already done.

3 is correct.

4th one.

a) number can be from 0.45 to 0.54 --- not sufficient
b) number can be from 0.50 to 1.49 ---- sufficient
Join the discussion