RC challenge

[abhasjha]

In many Western societies, modern bankruptcy
laws have undergone a shift away from a focus on
punishment and toward a focus on bankruptcy as a
remedy for individuals and corporations in financial
(5) trouble—and, perhaps unexpectedly, for their
creditors. This shift has coincided with an ever
increasing reliance on declarations of bankruptcy by
individuals and corporations with excessive debt, a
trend that has drawn widespread criticism. However,
(10) any measure seeking to make bankruptcy protection
less available would run the risk of preventing
continued economic activity of financially troubled
individuals and institutions. It is for this reason that
the temptation to return to a focus on punishment of
(15) individuals or corporations that become insolvent
must be resisted. Modern bankruptcy laws, in serving
the needs of an interdependent society, serve the
varied interests of the greatest number of citizens.

The harsh punishment for insolvency in centuries
(20) past included imprisonment of individuals and
dissolution of enterprises, and reflected societies'
beliefs that the accumulation of excessive debt
resulted either from debtors' unwillingness to meet
obligations or from their negligence. Insolvent debtors
(25) were thought to be breaking sacrosanct social
contracts; placing debtors in prison was considered
necessary in order to remove from society those who
would violate such contracts and thereby defraud
creditors. But creditors derive little benefit from
(30) imprisoned debtors unable to repay even a portion of
their debt. And if the entity to be punished is a large
enterprise, for example, an auto manufacturer, its
dissolution would cause significant unemployment
and the disruption of much-needed services.


(35) Modern bankruptcy law has attempted to address
the shortcomings of the punitive approach. Two
beliefs underlie this shift: that the public good ought
to be paramount in considering the financial
insolvency of individuals and corporations; and that
(40) the public good is better served by allowing
debt-heavy corporations to continue to operate, and
indebted individuals to continue to earn wages,
than by disabling insolvent economic entities. The
mechanism for executing these goals is usually a
(45) court-directed reorganization of debtors' obligations to
creditors. Such reorganizations typically comprise
debt relief and plans for court-directed transfers of
certain assets from debtor to creditor. Certain
strictures connected to bankruptcy—such as the fact
(50) that bankruptcies become matters of public record
and are reported to credit bureaus for a number of
years—may still serve a punitive function, but not by
denying absolution of debts or financial
reorganization. Through these mechanisms, today's
(55) bankruptcy laws are designed primarily to assure
continued engagement in productive economic
activity, with the ultimate goal of restoring businesses
and individuals to a degree of economic health and
providing creditors with the best hope of collecting.







6. Which one of the following most accurately expresses
the main point of the passage?

(A) The modern trend in bankruptcy law away from
punishment and toward the maintenance of
economic activity serves the best interests of
society and should not be abandoned.

(B) Bankruptcy laws have evolved in order to meet
the needs of creditors, who depend on the
continued productive activity of private citizens
and profit-making enterprises.

(C) Modern bankruptcy laws are justified on
humanitarian grounds, even though the earlier
punitive approach was more economically
efficient.

(D) Punishment for debt no longer holds deterrent
value for debtors and is therefore a concept that
has been largely abandoned as ineffective.

(E) Greater economic interdependence has triggered
the formation of bankruptcy laws that reflect
a convergence of the interests of debtors and
creditors.


7 . In stating that bankruptcy laws have evolved "perhaps
unexpectedly" (line 5) as a remedy for creditors, the
author implies that creditors

(A) are often surprised to receive compensation in
bankruptcy courts

(B) have unintentionally become the chief
beneficiaries of bankruptcy laws

(C) were a consideration, though not a primary one,
in the formulation of bankruptcy laws

(D) are better served than is immediately apparent by
laws designed in the first instance to provide a
remedy for debtors

(E) were themselves active in the formulation of
modern bankruptcy laws




8. The author's attitude toward the evolution of bankruptcy
law can most accurately be described as

(A) approval of changes that have been made to
inefficient laws

(B) confidence that further changes to today's laws
will be unnecessary

(C) neutrality toward laws that, while helpful to
many, remain open to abuse

(D) skepticism regarding the possibility of solutions
to the problem of insolvency

(E) concern that inefficient laws may have been
replaced by legislation too lenient to debtors


9. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) offer a critique of both past and present
approaches to insolvency

(B) compare the practices of bankruptcy courts of
the past with those of bankruptcy courts of the
present

(C) criticize those who would change the bankruptcy
laws of today

(D) reexamine today's bankruptcy laws in an effort to
point to further improvements

(E) explain and defend contemporary bankruptcy
Laws



10. Which one of the following claims would a defender of
the punitive theory of bankruptcy legislation be most
likely to have made?

(A) Debt that has become so great that repayment
is impossible is ultimately a moral failing and
thus a matter for which the law should provide
punitive sanctions.

(B) Because insolvency ultimately harms the entire
economy, the law should provide a punitive
deterrent to insolvency.

(C) The insolvency of companies or individuals is
tolerable if the debt is the result of risk-taking,
profit-seeking ventures that might create
considerable economic growth in the long run.

(D) The dissolution of a large enterprise is costly
to the economy as a whole and should not be
allowed, even when that enterprise's insolvency
is the result of its own fiscal irresponsibility.

(E) The employees of a large bankrupt enterprise
should be considered just as negligent as the
owner of a bankrupt sole proprietorship.


11. Which one of the following sentences could most
logically be appended to the end of the last paragraph of
the passage?

(A) Only when today's bankruptcy laws are
ultimately seen as inadequate on a large scale
will bankruptcy legislation return to its original
intent.

(B) Punishment is no longer the primary goal of
bankruptcy law, even if some of its side effects
still function punitively.

(C) Since leniency serves the public interest in
bankruptcy law, it is likely to do so in criminal
law as well.

(D) Future bankruptcy legislation could include
punitive measures, but only if such measures
ultimately benefit creditors.

(E) Today's bankruptcy laws place the burden
of insolvency squarely on the shoulders of
creditors, in marked contrast to the antiquated
laws that weighed heavily on debtors


12. The information in the passage most strongly suggests
which one of the following about changes in bankruptcy
laws?

(A) Bankruptcy laws always result from gradual
changes in philosophy followed by sudden
shifts in policy.

(B) Changes in bankruptcy law were initiated by
the courts and only grudgingly adopted by
legislators.

(C) The adjustment of bankruptcy laws away from
a punitive focus was at first bitterly opposed by
creditors.

(D) Bankruptcy laws underwent change because the
traditional approach proved inadequate and
contrary to the needs of society.

(E) The shift away from a punitive approach to
insolvency was part of a more general trend in
society toward rehabilitation and away from
retribution


13. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken
the author's argument against harsh punishment for
debtors?

(A) Extensive study of the economic and legal
history of many countries has shown that
most individuals who served prison time for
bankruptcy subsequently exhibited greater
economic responsibility.


(B) The bankruptcy of a certain large company
has had a significant negative impact on the
local economy even though virtually all of the
affected employees were able to obtain similar
jobs within the community.

(C) Once imprisonment was no longer a consequence
of insolvency, bankruptcy filings increased
dramatically, then leveled off before increasing
again during the 1930s.

(D) The court-ordered liquidation of a large and
insolvent company's assets threw hundreds
of people out of work, but the local economy
nevertheless demonstrated robust growth in the
immediate aftermath.

(E) Countries that continue to imprison debtors enjoy
greater economic health than do comparable
countries that have ceased to do so.

[kc_raj]

IMO
6A
C
A
9e
A
B
D
13D

[rahulsaroha]

my answers:

a
d
a
b
b
e
e
d

[rahulg83]

Was a relatively tough one...
My Answers
A D A B C B D E
Time taken 15 minutes

@abhasjha..
Post the OA.

[abhasjha]

Question #6: The correct answer choice Is (A)

Before looking at the choices, you should be sure to prephrase the answer to any Main Point question. In this case, the Main Point is that bankruptcy laws in Western societies have changed to better serve the interests of the greater good.

Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice, as it provides a basic restatement of our prephrase above. The author believes that bankruptcy laws have changed, and we should not go back to a system that focuses on punishment rather than on the greater good of society.

Answer choice (B): Although the author points out that modern bankruptcy laws do help creditors, the author does not claim that creditors' needs caused the evolution of these laws, so this answer choice is incorrect.

Answer choice (C): Modern bankruptcy laws are based in part on humanitarian concerns, but the author does not assert that the earlier approach was more efficient. In fact, the passage specifically points out that the imprisonment of debtors could not benefit creditors (line 29).

Answer choice (D): According to the passage, the old approach was focused on punishment and was an inefficient means of dealing with insolvency. The author does not discuss the issue of deterrence and does not assert that a lack of deterrence caused the discussed changes in the laws.

Answer choice (E): Economic interdependence allows for the interests of debtors and creditors to be aligned, but the author does not claim that increased interdependence has triggered current laws, so this answer choice is incorrect.


Question #7: The correct answer choice is (D)

The "unexpected remedy" Implies that the creditors may not have expected to gain from laws meant to help debtors.

Answer choice (A): The author does not imply that creditors are surprised to get any compensation in bankruptcy court, so this answer should be eliminated.

Answer choice (B): There is no implication that the creditors would be the chief beneficiaries, only that they might benefit.

Answer choice (C): This is a potentially tricky wrong answer choice. The referenced implication is that the creditors might unexpectedly benefit from laws that serve an interdependent society, but the author does not discuss whether the creditors were considered when the bankruptcy laws were formulated.

Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice. The implication, as prephrased, is that creditors may, surprisingly, benefit from laws intended to help debtors.
Answer choice (E): There is no implication that the creditors were involved in formulating modern bankruptcy laws. Further, the author implies that the creditors were surprised to benefit from the laws, so it seems unlikely that they were involved in their formulation.


Question #8: The correct answer choice is (A)

The author's attitude is that the old laws were counterproductive and detrimental, and the modern approach to bankruptcy makes more sense for all parties involved.

Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice, and reflects our prephrase above. The author approves of the modern approach as more reasonable and effective than the historical approach.

Answer choice (B): This answer goes too far. The author agrees with the changes that have taken place, but does not go so far as to claim that no further changes to the laws will ever be necessary.

Answer choice (C): The author's attitude is not neutral; it is supportive of the changes that have taken place, so this answer choice Is incorrect.

Answer choice (D): The author is not skeptical, but supportive of the idea that bankruptcy under the modern approach can serve the interests of both debtors and creditors.

Answer choice (E): The author supports modern legislation, and never suggests that newer intent, so this answer choice should be eliminated.


Question #9: The correct answer choice is (E)

The author's main purpose is to discuss the old and new approaches to bankruptcy, and explain the modern approach is preferable.

Answer choice (A): The passage does discuss both past and present approaches, but the purpose is more than to provide a critique of each.. The author clearly wants to support the modern approach and warn against going back to the historical approach.

Answer choice (B): The author does compare the old approach to the new approach, but this is not the primary purpose, which is to lend support to the modern perspective on bankruptcy.

Answer choice (C): The author does not seek to criticize currently proposed changes, but to warn against the historical, punishment-based perspective.

Answer choice (D): The author supports the modern perspective on bankruptcy, and does not discuss further improvements.

Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer choice. The author discusses the basis of the modern approach, and provides several points in support of this perspective.



Question #10: The correct answer choice is (A)

To prephrase the answer to this question, we should consider what drove the historical perspective. This comes from the discussion in the second paragraph, in which the author explains that insolvent debtors were seen as negligent or unwilling to pay, and it was necessary to punish and remove these
contract breakers from society.

Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice. The historical perspective saw the insolvent as deserving of punishment. Punishment was a primary focus of the old perspective, so a propoent of this perspective would likely call for punitive sanctions.

Answer choice (B): This is a popular wrong answer, as it seems a reasonble defense of a punitive approach. The passage does not present deterrence as a driving justification for the historical approach, however, so this answer choice is incorrect.

Answer choice (C): A proponent of the historical perspective would likely have little tolerance for insolvency, regardless of the long term prospects.

Answer choice (D): This answer choice represents the modern perspective, and that of the author, rather than the viewpoint associated with the historical approach to bankruptcy.

Answer choice (E): There is no reference or implication regarding this specific assigment of negligence, so we cannot be sure of the historical perspective on this issue



Question #11: The correct answer choice is (B)

If we are to prephrase an answer to this passage expansion question, it is valuable to consider how the passage ended. In this case the closing point was that modern bankruptcy laws may be punitive on some level, but they are intended to promote economic activity and help all parties involved.
The right answer choice will likely either continue this general theme, or reference the passage in general.
Answer choice (A): This response would make no sense at the end of this passage. The author is a fan of today's bankruptcy laws, and would not have such a positive tone with regard to original intent.
Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice, as this response logically restates the point with which the author ends the passage.

Answer choice (C): There is no reference to criminal law in the passage, so this answer choice would not logically follow.

Answer choice (D): The author mentions the punitive facet of current bankruptcy law, but never references prospective punitive measures in the future, so this answer choice should be eliminated.


Answer choice (E): The author believes that modern law favors all parties concemed involved, in stark contrast to this answer choice.



Question #12: The correct answer choice Is (D)

Answer choice (A); We can rule out this answer choice based on the word "always" since the author makes no such absolute claims. Further, in the one example discussed, it seems that a change in policy was followed by a gradual change in philosophy among creditors.

Answer choice (B): There is no reference or implication that the courts led the way, so this answer choice is incorrect.

Answer choice (C): The author implied that benefit to creditors may have been unexpected, but this is not the same as claiming a bitter opposition on the part of the creditors.
Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice. The author discusses several points of inadequacy of the historical approach, and asserts that the new laws are an improvement, so we can assume that the changes were a result of these inadequacies.

Answer choice (E): Since there are no discussions or implications o f such broad societal trends cannot be the right answer choice.



Question #13: The correct answer choice Is (E)

The authors argument against harsh punishment for debtors is that this treatment is economically counterproductive. The correct answer choice will somehow weaken or cast doubt on this point.

Answer choice (A): This answer choice does not weaken the basic argument that bankrupt individuals cannot be productive while in prison.

Answer choice (B): This choice supports the author's argument against harsh punishment.

Answer choice (C): This answer choice would not weaken the general claims about non-productivity, only that there may have been many who needed bankruptcy but had been afraid to make a claim.

Answer choice (D): A single example of immediate growth does not disprove the author's more general claims about bankruptcy, so this answer choice is incorrect.

Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer choice, as it strengthens the assertion that harsh debtor punishment is good for an economy.