BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is it true that x>0?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by aj5105 » Sun May 17, 2009 9:24 am
Statement 1:

x^2 = 2x

x = 2

Sufficient

Statement 2:

x^3 = 3x

x * x^2 = 3x

x^2 = 3

x = + root3

Insufficient.

(A)
Join the discussion

by Jose Ferreira » Sun May 17, 2009 9:24 am
Great question!

Statement 1:
x can equal 0 or 2 and satisfy this equation, so it must be insufficient.
(0)^2=2(0)
(2)^2=2(2)

Statement 2:
x can equal 0 or sqrt3 or -sqrt3, so it is also insufficient.
(0)^3=3(0)
(sqrt3)^3=(sqrt3)^3

Put the statements together, and we see that the only number that satisfies both equations is 0. So, the answer to the original question is "No," but you cannot confuse an answer of "No" with a lack of sufficiency.

The Answer is C
Last edited by Jose Ferreira on Wed May 20, 2009 10:24 am, edited 3 times in total.
Jose Ferreira
Founder and CEO, Knewton, Inc.
https://www.knewton.com/gmat
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Sun May 17, 2009 9:29 am
Jose, could you please correct my mistake?

Thanks,
AJ
Jose Ferreira wrote:Great question!

Statement 1:
x can equal 0 or 2 and satisfy this equation, so it must be insufficient.
(0)^2=2(0)
(2)^2=2(2)

Statement 2:
x can equal 0 or sqrt3 or -sqrt3
(0)^3=3(0)
(sqrt3)^3=(sqrt3)^3

Put the statements together, and we see that the only number that satisfies both equations is 0. So, the answer to the original question is "No", but you cannot confuse an answer of "No" is a lack of sufficiency.

The Answer is C[/list]
Join the discussion

by awesomeusername » Sun May 17, 2009 9:30 am
Hello Jose,

Thank you for your explanation! I too gave the same explanations, but GMAC had the wrong explanation for (2), so I just wanted to make sure it wasn't me.
Constant dripping hollows out a stone.
-Lucretius
Join the discussion

by awesomeusername » Sun May 17, 2009 9:31 am
AJ, for (1), x can be 0 or 2. Forgetting the 0 is the tricky part.
Constant dripping hollows out a stone.
-Lucretius
Join the discussion

by dmateer25 » Sun May 17, 2009 9:32 am
awesomeusername wrote:Hello Jose,

Thank you for your explanation! I too gave the same explanations, but GMAC had the wrong explanation for (2), so I just wanted to make sure it wasn't me.
I was just going to mention that! I took a gmatfocus test last night and had this question.

GMAC OE says that for statement 2, x is 0, 3, or -3 which is clearly wrong.
Join the discussion

by Jose Ferreira » Sun May 17, 2009 9:37 am
Yes, that's exactly right AJ. You always have to check for restrictions on the variable in data sufficiency. In this question, they simply ask you whether x>0. We can safely assume that x can be positive, negative, or zero. Many times, that is not the case (i.e. "X is a positive integer..."), but when there are no restrictions, you can't forget about the possibility of the variable being 0.
Last edited by Jose Ferreira on Wed May 20, 2009 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jose Ferreira
Founder and CEO, Knewton, Inc.
https://www.knewton.com/gmat
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Sun May 17, 2009 2:51 pm
Hi Jose,

I can not get this stmt,

x can equal 0 or sqrt3 or -sqrt3
(0)^3=3(0)
(sqrt3)^3=(sqrt3)^3

stmt 2 says

x^3 = 3x

then why we are going for a avlue like 1.732 ? is not x an integer?
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by Jose Ferreira » Wed May 20, 2009 10:34 am
That's correct. The question does not specify that x is an integer. So, both sqrt3 and -sqrt3 are valid values for x given statement 2.
Jose Ferreira
Founder and CEO, Knewton, Inc.
https://www.knewton.com/gmat
Join the discussion