tj123 wrote:Hi,
I took a practice test and scored the following
Overall score: 590 / 67%
Quantitative : 42 / 66%
Verbal: 30 / 59%
I only got 10 questions incorrect on math
I only got 7 questions incorrect on verbal.
How come my verbal score is much much lower than my math score?
i thought verbal is historically harder for people and that a less number of incorrect questions on verbal would mean a higher verbal score?
please help me understand.
I don't want to single out groups but Indian / East Asian students really skew the percentile for quant. Typically Indian and East Asian students score very well, many times with 48 / 49/ 50 + on Quant and just whatever on verbal. This is similar to their success on the GRE's as well.
So that's not really an explanation, but its a reason why quant scores are harder to achieve. As a group, most Indian/East Asian students think the quant section is a joke and the only thing they review on the quant section is the vocabulary such as learning what integer / remainder mean ... =/ I've met many many Indian / East Asian students and even the liberal arts / film majors have a stronger grasp of numbers than many American that perhaps studied finance / accounting in school.
Keep in mind Indian / East Asian students are not to be confused with Indian American / Asian American students who most likely did not have the same quantitative training as their Indian / East Asian counterparts.
It kinda makes me want to send my kids to china/india to learn math.
Sorry about the tangeant.
As for scoring - ... MGMAT class says that you're meant to only get about 60% of the questions right. Yes - the first few questions adjust your score more than the latter questions, but by spending too much time on the beginning, you're not really doing justice to the latter portion of the exam. The CAT is meant to at the end essentially adjust to what your true score is so then when it finally gauges your real score, in hypothetical land - you'll be getting one right / one wrong.