BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Distance in Cartesian Plane

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: Distance in Cartesian Plane

by Vemuri » Tue May 05, 2009 8:47 am
The question stem provides us with 2 points (1,2) & (0,5/2). Using the slope formula ==> ((5/2)-2)/(0-1) ==> -1/2

IMO B
Join the discussion

Re: Distance in Cartesian Plane

by dtweah » Tue May 05, 2009 3:07 pm
Vemuri wrote:The question stem provides us with 2 points (1,2) & (0,5/2). Using the slope formula ==> ((5/2)-2)/(0-1) ==> -1/2

IMO B
Give it another shot vemuri.
Join the discussion

Re: Distance in Cartesian Plane

by Vemuri » Tue May 05, 2009 7:40 pm
dtweah wrote:
Vemuri wrote:The question stem provides us with 2 points (1,2) & (0,5/2). Using the slope formula ==> ((5/2)-2)/(0-1) ==> -1/2

IMO B
Give it another shot vemuri.
Ok, the slope should be determined by using a point on the line & the y intercept. But, how are we to determine the point? I think I am stuck here.

I am not sure I understand how to use the info that (1,2) is (3(2)^0.5)/4 away from the line on the XY plane.
Join the discussion

by dumb.doofus » Tue May 05, 2009 8:31 pm
Phew!!! Man.. such problems come on GMAT??? I am not sure..
anyways, the solution is in the picture below... login to see..
I think the answer should be 1 i.e. option D


Image
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Tue May 05, 2009 8:46 pm
Damn !!! Unless there is a easier way to solve this problem, I bet this is not a GMAT question.
Join the discussion

Re: Distance in Cartesian Plane

by dtweah » Wed May 06, 2009 2:03 am
dtweah wrote:The distance between the point (1,2) and a line in the X-Y plane is (3(2)^0.5)/4. If the y intercept of the line is 5/2 find the slope of the line?

A. -1

B -1/2

C. 1/2

D. 1

E. 2
Altough you could use the distance to a line formula and solve you can also solve without it. Put eqn into y=mx+b y=mx+5/2 or 2y=mx+5. Plug point in (1,2) you can find slope m.
2(2)=m(1)+5
m=1
Choose D.

Using Distance Formula:
Rationalize distance. 3/(2)2^.5
Denominator equal square root of 8=4+4 or 2^2+2^2
So A=+-2 and B=+-2



|Ax +B +C|=|3| From y intercept info you know C=5 and A =2
|2(1)+B(2)+5|=3
|7+2B|=3

The def of absolute value has:
7+2B= 3, for B=-2, this solves.

7+2B=-3, since distance is never negative we ignore this part

The eqn is 2x-2y=5 from which the slope can be determined to be 1.
Choose D.

The first method solved under 1 min. The second about midway over 1.
Join the discussion

by avenus » Wed May 06, 2009 3:27 am
I believe there's stg wrong with your reasoning:
Altough you could use the distance to a line formula and solve you can also solve without it. Put eqn into y=mx+b y=mx+5/2 or 2y=mx+5. Plug point in (1,2) you can find slope m.
2(2)=m(1)+5
m=1
you're assuming the line will cross (1,2). Why? Distance would then be zero....plus result would be m=-1

The eqn is 2x-2y=5 from which the slope can be determined to be 1.
Choose D.
This eq yields a y-intercept of -5/2, which is different from the 5/2 stated in the problem
Join the discussion

by dtweah » Wed May 06, 2009 4:47 am
avenus wrote:I believe there's stg wrong with your reasoning:
Altough you could use the distance to a line formula and solve you can also solve without it. Put eqn into y=mx+b y=mx+5/2 or 2y=mx+5. Plug point in (1,2) you can find slope m.
2(2)=m(1)+5
m=1
you're assuming the line will cross (1,2). Why? Distance would then be zero....plus result would be m=-1

The eqn is 2x-2y=5 from which the slope can be determined to be 1.
Choose D.
This eq yields a y-intercept of -5/2, which is different from the 5/2 stated in the problem
The latter is a transpositional error. Ax +BY +C= 0 so 2x-2y+5=0. Which has slope 1. The former is a serious error and you are right. (1,2) does not pass through 2x-2y+5=0(1,7/2) does. So the only valid solution is method 2. I spotted the error in V's response when I told him to try again but committed the same error! I think where the error comes from is that in using the formula for finding the distance between a point and a line, we use the point in the equation but this does not mean the point is on the line! Good observation. Thanks.
Join the discussion