BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS 500 TET7#22

Expert replies
by dunkin77 » Sun Apr 08, 2007 2:30 pm
Hi,

The correct answer is D) but why 2) only can prove?

From the text, x>-y and asking if X is larger than the absolute value of Y.

So, for example, 4> - 2 -- OK
4 > - 6 ---Not OK
I know 1) can prove it by telling us both are positive and still X is larger than Y, but what dose 2) tell you to prove this?? hmm. Can anyone please explain?

If x + y >0, is x > |y|?
(1) x > y
(2) y < 0
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: DS 500 TET7#22

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:09 pm
dunkin77 wrote:Hi,

The correct answer is D) but why 2) only can prove?

From the text, x>-y and asking if X is larger than the absolute value of Y.

So, for example, 4> - 2 -- OK
4 > - 6 ---Not OK
I know 1) can prove it by telling us both are positive and still X is larger than Y, but what dose 2) tell you to prove this?? hmm. Can anyone please explain?

If x + y >0, is x > |y|?
(1) x > y
(2) y < 0
In your example, 4 > -6 does not satisfy the original constraint x+y>0


1 - sufficient. When y is positive, x > y yields x > |y|. When y is negative,
we know that |y| < x since x + y > 0.

2 - sufficient. y is negative. x has to be positive since x+y > 0.
Also |y| < x else x+y cannot be > 0. For example if y = -2, x has
to be greater than 3 else x+y will be negative.


Hence D
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:41 am
Suppose y = -14, x has to be greater than or equal to 15 for the sum to be more than 1.

-14+15=1
-8+9=1

15 is greater than absolute value of -14.
9 is greater than absolute value of -8
If the absolute value of y>= x then we can never satisfy the given equation i.e. x+y>0
Try it
If y = -9 and x = 5; in this case absolute value of y is >=value of x; but it negates the equation i.e. x+y>0

Hence D
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
To prove: x>|y|

if y<0 x>-y or x+y >0 which is the stem so the ans is yes.
Join the discussion