BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS - absolute value question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by stubbornp » Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:31 pm
The method which i used for thse q's is picking numbers.

acc to stimulus,|a|>|b|

we can assume these values a=3,-3 b=2,-2,0

acc to stmt 1:a<0

it means a=-3,-4 b=-2,2,0...we are getting different answers by putting these values----Insufficient

acc to stmt 2. ab=0

bcoz |a|>|b|....ie b=0--sufficient...

IMO B...if i am not right,then there should be a mistake in stmt 2.
Join the discussion

by acecoolan » Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:45 pm
Sorry ...just noticed that part of the question was typed wrong.
Statement 2 should read

ab >= 0
Join the discussion

by stubbornp » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:49 am
acecoolan wrote:Sorry ...just noticed that part of the question was typed wrong.
Statement 2 should read

ab >= 0

ok...so now i ll start from stmt 2 directly

ab>=0

one option is either b=0.....

for greater than 0,both a & b should be of same sign...

a=-3,3 b=-2,2

by putting the values,you ll see different results----insufficient


By combing both,again we are getting more than one answers...

So it should be E...hope it helps.
Join the discussion

by raju232007 » Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:57 am
statement 1:

a<0
a is negative but it tells nothing about b...

Insufficient

statement 2:

ab>=0
so both a and b should have the same sign or any of the two integers can be equal to 0.
In other words a & b are both positive or negative
Let a=3,b=2( Here we should assume a>b as it is given that |a|>|b|)
a · |b| < a – b
6<1............... Ans is no
Let a=-3,b=-2
-6<-1............. Ans is yes

Insufficient

Combining both the statements we get

a<0...so b should also be negative
and |a|>|b|
Let a=-5 b=-2
a · |b| < a – b
-10<-3......Ans is yes
But we have to consider one more case...statement 2 states that ab>=0
so any of the two integers can be equal to zero..(a=0 or b=0)
we know that a<0(from statement 1)..So lets assume b=0
Now let a=-5 & b=0
a · |b| < a – b
0<-5....Ans is no

So the ans should be E...Let me know if you have any doubts...
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:38 am
Can somebody please solve it algebraically? Ian please?
Join the discussion