BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

to do vs for doing

Expert replies
by tanviet » Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:30 am
by showing that South Africa does not have a free market and is in fact a kind of collectivist welfare state for Whites only, Sovell argues that American convervatives have no valid ideological grounds to be in sympathy with the Pretoria regime.

a,to be in sympathy with

b, to sympathize with

c, for sympathizing with

d,that they should sympathize with

e, that they should have sympathy for



what is correct and explain, . this question is from plusbook, from a newly retired test.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by gmat740 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:00 am
IMO B


to sympathize with

correct idiom

although I am confused with C also
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:52 am
IMO B

Idiomatic and pithy. "to be in sympathy" is unidiomatic. "they" in D and E is ambiguous.

In GMAT, infinitive form is always preferred over "-ing" form. Hence, B is preferred over C, but not sure if there is any grammatical error in C.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:37 pm
I agree with you and choose B. However, OA is C and this make me confused. any idea ?
Join the discussion

by cramya » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:44 pm
Grounds for is the correct idiom and not grounds to

Hence C may be the OA
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:00 pm
Grounds for is the correct idiom and not grounds to

Hence C may be the OA
Hello Cramya,

In the question, i think we need to correct the underline part(although the underline part is not mention in the original question) but looking at the options simple gives an idea about the underline part

As far as I know, Grounds to may be incorrect but this is not the underlined part and in no way Option C is going to convert the Idiom Grounds for v/s ground to

Please correct me if I am wrong

Karan
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:37 am
the choices all start with to/for/that. the non underlined portion ends with ground. so the question is "ground to" or "ground for"

with cramya on "ground for".
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:16 am
can we have the OA now?
Join the discussion

by kapsii » Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:07 am
Karan, As mentioned earlier by duongthang, the OA is C.

As for your question in an earlier post, when correcting the underlined portion of the sentence, you cannot ignore the rest of the sentence, because mostly the rest of the sentence might carry the noun or a list to check for parallelism and other things that you generally need to correct.

I think of the objective to be more like find the replacement for the underlined part which makes the whole sentence look grammatically better than the original sentence (of course with out changing its meaning).

and also, "grounds for" seems less awkward than "grounds to"...
Cheers,
Dubes
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1