BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Al working alone

Expert replies
by Vemuri » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:30 am
Al can complete a particular job in 8 hrs. Boris can complete the same job in 5hrs. Cody can complete a second job, which requires twice as much work as the first, in 8hrs. If all three people work together on the larger job for 2hrs, how long, in hours, would it take Al, working alone, to finish the job?

A. 0.8
B. 3.0
C. 6.8
D. 8.0
E. 8.8
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by cramya » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:54 am
I would go with C ) 6.8

Al's rate for smaller job = 1/8
Bigger job = 1/16

Boris rate for smaller job = 1/5
bigger job = 1/10

Cody's rate = 1/8


Work together for 2 hours on larger job

rate * time = work

(1/16+1/10+1/8) * 2 = work

work = 23/40

17/40 of the works remains

If Al was to work by himself to complete this then again

rate * time = work

1/16*time = 17/40

time = 6.8
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:14 am
cramya wrote:I would go with C ) 6.8

Al's rate for smaller job = 1/8
Bigger job = 1/16

Boris rate for smaller job = 1/5
bigger job = 1/10

Cody's rate = 1/8
Hi Cramya,
I have a question on how u got Cody's rate. The Q says that Cody can complete the second job which takes twice as long as the first in 8hrs.

I think this stmt is very ambiguous. I can interpret it in the multiple ways.

1. Cody can complete the first job as well as the second job in 8hrs. And 2nd job takes twice as long. ie. 1st job takes 2.67 hrs and 2nd job takes 5.33 hrs

2. Cody can complete "another job" which takes twice as long as first in 8 hrs. This implies that Cody can complete the first job in 4 hrs.


Pls comment....

thanks
-V
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:12 pm
1. Cody can complete the first job as well as the second job in 8hrs. And 2nd job takes twice as long. ie. 1st job takes 2.67 hrs and 2nd job takes 5.33 hrs
Vittal,
I see where u r coming from but I am not sure if "Cody can complete a second job, which requires twice as much work as the first, in 8hrs" can be interpretted as

first job + second job = 8 hours

Instead I would think it would be

first job(1/2 work-> 4 hours) + 2nd job(1 work->8 hours) = 12 hours


Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by lilu » Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:23 pm
Al's rate=1/16, Boris' rate=1/10, Cody's rate=1/8
Combined rate=1/16+1/10+1/8=23/80
In 2hrs the complete=23/80*2=23/40 of a job
Remaining job=17/40
It will take Al (Time=Work/Rate)-->(17/40)/1/16=34/5 OR 6.8hrs to finish the second job
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:49 pm
vittalgmat wrote: I think this stmt is very ambiguous. I can interpret it in the multiple ways.

1. Cody can complete the first job as well as the second job in 8hrs. And 2nd job takes twice as long. ie. 1st job takes 2.67 hrs and 2nd job takes 5.33 hrs

2. Cody can complete "another job" which takes twice as long as first in 8 hrs. This implies that Cody can complete the first job in 4 hrs.


Pls comment....

thanks
-V
Your second interpretation is correct. If you see the framing of the question "Cody can complete a second job, which requires twice as much work as the first, in 8hrs", its using relative pronoun 'which' to add on that the second job takes twice as much work as the first job takes. So yes, interms of the first job Cody is pretty efficient & can finish the first job in just 4hrs.
Join the discussion