BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

multiples

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:00 am
The problem here is that, when you take stmt 2, you get that y can be both 1 and 2. Since x is a multiple of y and x + 2 is also a multiple of y, then x divides x + 2 - x = 2. There are two options for this, 1 and 2. So 2 by itself is insufficient.
But combine it with stmt 1 and you eliminate 1, so 2 will be the answer indeed.
Join the discussion

by Uri » Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:46 pm
the presence of statement (1) makes us aware of the trap. else, i would also have picked (B). this is a really silly trap. but "i'm loving it" :D
Join the discussion

by cramya » Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:48 pm
Naga,
Excellent trap question. Whats ths source?

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

rep

by naaga » Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:38 pm
1000 DS cramya.
Join the discussion

by Bidisha_800 » Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:21 pm
(1) y ≠ 1
y could be {2, 3, 4, 5, ...}. INSUFF

(2) x + 2 is a multiple of y <==> (x+2 = ny)
x is a multiple of y <==> (x = my)
So, my + 2 = ny
2 = ny - my
2 = (n-m)y
y = 2 / (n-m)

Since y must be positive integer. (n-m) could only be 1 or 2.
If (n-m) = 1, y = 2.
If (n-m) = 2, y = 1.
y could be either 1 or 2. INSUFF.

(1) + (2)
Since y &#8800; 1, we know that y must be equal to 2. SUFF.

C. is the answer.
GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
Join the discussion

by kheba » Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:36 pm
C is the answer. Lets take it this way :

1. Y can be anything , not a solution

2. Lets take x = 4 multiple of 2 (y). Then x+2 is not a multiple of y. Same for other values of y .. But if we club both the conditions , it satisfies
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:09 pm
nice solution Bidisha. kudos
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion