BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep - absolute x

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by radhaswami » Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:36 pm
There are two cases in the main question stem

CASE 1
when x>0 implies is x=y-z?

CASE 2
When x<0 implies -x=y-z or is x+y=z

Now look at the two helps given (1) says x+y=z but it is not given if x<0 or not so INSUFFICIENT

(2) given x<o nothing about y and z so INSUFFICIENT

BOTH SUFFICIENT AS THEY SATISFY CASE2
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:31 am
IMO B

(1) x + y = z makes x = z - y, hence mod (x) = mod (z - y), which could be equal to y - z regardless what sign is x with, only if y > z. This is because an absolute value is non-negative; and since we know nothing about y and z, hence insufficient.

(2) reads x < 0, this means that z - y < 0; and this makes us believe that 'yes', mod (x) = y - z. So (2) alone is sufficient, hence B.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by x2suresh » Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:56 am
sanju09 wrote:IMO B

(1) x + y = z makes x = z - y, hence mod (x) = mod (z - y), which could be equal to y - z regardless what sign is x with, only if y > z. This is because an absolute value is non-negative; and since we know nothing about y and z, hence insufficient.

(2) reads x < 0, this means that z - y < 0; and this makes us believe that 'yes', mod (x) = y - z. So (2) alone is sufficient, hence B.
State 2 not given any info regarding y and z
not sufficient

It should be C.
Join the discussion

correction

by sanju09 » Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:28 am
sanju09 wrote:IMO C

(1) x + y = z makes x = z - y, hence mod (x) = mod (z - y), which could be equal to y - z regardless what sign is x with, only if y > z. This is because an absolute value is non-negative; and since we know nothing about y and z, hence insufficient.

(2) reads x < 0, insufficient for the same reasons as given in (1).

(1) & (2) means that z - y < 0; and this makes us believe that 'yes', mod (x) = y - z, hence C.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion