This is a classic example for picking numbers:
(1) Insufficient: both a = 0.5 (or any other positive number less than 1) and b = -2 (or any other negative number less than -1) give the necessary result in the equation.
(2) Insufficient: both a = 0.5 (or any other positive number less than 1) and b = -0.5 (or any other negative number more than 1) give the necessary result in the equation.
However, when combining both of the statements we know that a must be a positive number less than 1.
Therefore, C
Inequality
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
- DanaJ
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2567
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
- Thanked: 712 times
- Followed by:550 members
- GMAT Score:770
1. a^3 - a < 0 is equivalent to a(a^2 - 1) < 0 or P = a(a + 1)(a - 1) < 0. Now let's see when this happens:
a. first off, if a > 1, then P > 0. So we need to check cases before that.
b. when a < -1, then you have P = (negative numer)(negative number)(negative number), which is negative, so P < 0.
c. when a is between -1 and 0, then a + 1 turns positive, so P = (negative)(positive)(negative), which will be positive, so P > 0.
d. when a is between 0 and 1, then both a and a + 1 are positive, so P = (positive)(positive)(negative), which will be negative. So P < 0.
We are not checking the cases when a = -1, 0 or 1, since in any of these cases P = 0.
Now, as you can see, there are two cases in which P is negative:
- a < -1, when a < 0
- a is between 0 and 1, when a > 0.
So 1 is insufficient.
2. 1 - a^2 > 0 means that a^2 is smaller than 1. Since a^2 is greater than or equal to zero, then 0 <= a^2 < 1. This only happens when a is between -1 and 1. Again, you can't tell if a is positive, since -1 < a < 1.
Put both equations together and you get that the only section they intersect is when a is between 0 and 1, which means that a is positive.
My guess is C
a. first off, if a > 1, then P > 0. So we need to check cases before that.
b. when a < -1, then you have P = (negative numer)(negative number)(negative number), which is negative, so P < 0.
c. when a is between -1 and 0, then a + 1 turns positive, so P = (negative)(positive)(negative), which will be positive, so P > 0.
d. when a is between 0 and 1, then both a and a + 1 are positive, so P = (positive)(positive)(negative), which will be negative. So P < 0.
We are not checking the cases when a = -1, 0 or 1, since in any of these cases P = 0.
Now, as you can see, there are two cases in which P is negative:
- a < -1, when a < 0
- a is between 0 and 1, when a > 0.
So 1 is insufficient.
2. 1 - a^2 > 0 means that a^2 is smaller than 1. Since a^2 is greater than or equal to zero, then 0 <= a^2 < 1. This only happens when a is between -1 and 1. Again, you can't tell if a is positive, since -1 < a < 1.
Put both equations together and you get that the only section they intersect is when a is between 0 and 1, which means that a is positive.
My guess is C
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
whoa, people. when you factor the first expression, you should be able to notice the similarity between it and the the second one.
to wit:
statement 1: a(a^2 - 1) < 0.
statement 2: 1 - a^2 > 0.
you should notice that (a^2 - 1) and (1 - a^2) are opposites. if you don't normally notice things like that, you should start noticing them. in fact, relationships between factors tend to be far more important than the factors themselves.
once you notice that, reverse statement 2 so that the expression looks the same as in statement 1: i.e., a^2 - 1 < 0.
therefore, a(a^2 - 1) is negative, and (a^2 - 1) itself is negative.
or:
a * negative = negative.
or:
a is positive.
answer = (c).
--
of course, to get to this point in the first place, you have to determine that the individual statements are each insufficient; that's just routine factoring and solving. if anyone needs to know how to do that, post back.
to wit:
statement 1: a(a^2 - 1) < 0.
statement 2: 1 - a^2 > 0.
you should notice that (a^2 - 1) and (1 - a^2) are opposites. if you don't normally notice things like that, you should start noticing them. in fact, relationships between factors tend to be far more important than the factors themselves.
once you notice that, reverse statement 2 so that the expression looks the same as in statement 1: i.e., a^2 - 1 < 0.
therefore, a(a^2 - 1) is negative, and (a^2 - 1) itself is negative.
or:
a * negative = negative.
or:
a is positive.
answer = (c).
--
of course, to get to this point in the first place, you have to determine that the individual statements are each insufficient; that's just routine factoring and solving. if anyone needs to know how to do that, post back.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
Ron,lunarpower wrote: of course, to get to this point in the first place, you have to determine that the individual statements are each insufficient; that's just routine factoring and solving. if anyone needs to know how to do that, post back.
Can you explain how?
-
BuckeyeT
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:00 pm
- Thanked: 11 times
- GMAT Score:730
cunu-
Not sure if this detail will help you out, but I'll give it a shot.
Test: Is a>0?
(Supposition 1) a^3 - a < 0
I usually try to find the values where the function is equal to zero. If you know those values, all values in between will work out either < or > zero. For example, if two of these values are -1 and 1, you know that all the values less than -1 will be the same type of value (let's say < 0). It's probably easier to illustrate thus:
a^3 - a = 0
a (a^2 - 1) = 0 Simply factoring here
a (a - 1)(a + 1) = 0 Still factoring
a = 0; a = 1; a = -1 are the solutions when setting the function equal to zero.
From those solutions, we know that we have to test 4 different areas:
1. When a < -1
2. When -1 < a < 0
3. When 0 < a < 1
4. When 1 < a
1. Suppose a = -2; a (a - 1)(a + 1)
(-2)(-2 - 1)(-2 + 1) < 0
(-2)(-3)(-1) < 0
-6 < 0
True, so supposition (1) holds for a < -1
2. Suppose (-1/2); a (a - 1)(a + 1)
(-1/2)(-1/2 - 1)(-1/2 + 1) < 0
(-1/2)(-3/2)(1/2) < 0
(3/8) < 0
False, so (1) does not hold for -1 < a < 0
** At this point, since (Supposition 1) can be either greater than 0 or less than 0 (depending on chosen a), we know than (1) is insufficient for our Test. Although because it's pertinant to later discussion, I'll also solve for the other 2 areas (3. & 4. from above) **
3. Suppose (1/2); a (a - 1)(a + 1)
(1/2)(1/2 - 1)(1/2 + 1) < 0
(1/2)(-1/2)(3/2) < 0
(-3/8) < 0
True, so (1) holds for 0 < a < 1
4. Suppose a = 2; a (a - 1)(a + 1)
(2)(2 - 1)(2 + 1) < 0
(2)(1)(3) < 0
6 < 0
False, so (1) does not hold for 1 < a
(Supposition 2) 1 - a^2 > 0
Again, let's set it equal to zero to know which areas we need to test.
1 - (a)^2 = 0
(a)^2 - 1 = 0 Multiplied through by -1
(a - 1)(a + 1) = 0
a = 1 or a = -1
Since we have two values, we have three areas to test:
1. When a < -1
2. When -1 < a < 1
3. When 1 < a
1. Suppose a = -2; (a - 1)(a + 1)
(-2 - 1)(-2 + 1) < 0
(-3)(-1) < 0
3 < 0
False, so supposition (2) does not hold for a < -1.
2. Suppose 0; (a - 1)(a + 1)
(0 - 1)(0 + 1) < 0
(-1)(1) < 0
-1 < 0
True, so (2) does hold for -1 < a < 1.
** At this point, since (Supposition 2) can be either greater than 0 or less than 0 (depending on chosen a), we know than (2) is insufficient for our Test. Although because it's pertinant to later discussion, I'll also solve for the other 1 area (3. from above) **
3. Suppose 2; (a - 1)(a + 1)
(2 - 1)(2 + 1) < 0
(1)(3) < 0
3 < 0
False, so (2) does not hold for 1 < a.
Since we know that both suppositions and insufficient alone, we can now look at both together. If both together are true, where do their solutions overlap?
If a < -1, (1) is < 0 and (2) is > 0. This conflicts, so the solution to both cannot be in this area.
If a > -1, (1) is > 0 and (2) is < 0. This conflicts, so the solution to both cannot be in this area.
If -1 < a < 0, (1) is > 0 and (2) is < 0 (because we've seen that (2) is < 0 for all values between -1 and 1 non inclusive). This conflicts, so the solution to both cannot be in this area.
If 0 < a < 1, (1) is < 0 and (2) is < 0. This agrees, so the value if both suppositions are true must fall into this range. And since this solution allows us to answer our Test (a > 0?), we know that both (1) and (2) are sufficient for the Test.
Answer C.
PS: This is probably WAY more than you'll have time to do on the test, but it illustrates the steps in the most detail for your understanding. It is definitely not the most efficient solution.
Not sure if this detail will help you out, but I'll give it a shot.
Test: Is a>0?
(Supposition 1) a^3 - a < 0
I usually try to find the values where the function is equal to zero. If you know those values, all values in between will work out either < or > zero. For example, if two of these values are -1 and 1, you know that all the values less than -1 will be the same type of value (let's say < 0). It's probably easier to illustrate thus:
a^3 - a = 0
a (a^2 - 1) = 0 Simply factoring here
a (a - 1)(a + 1) = 0 Still factoring
a = 0; a = 1; a = -1 are the solutions when setting the function equal to zero.
From those solutions, we know that we have to test 4 different areas:
1. When a < -1
2. When -1 < a < 0
3. When 0 < a < 1
4. When 1 < a
1. Suppose a = -2; a (a - 1)(a + 1)
(-2)(-2 - 1)(-2 + 1) < 0
(-2)(-3)(-1) < 0
-6 < 0
True, so supposition (1) holds for a < -1
2. Suppose (-1/2); a (a - 1)(a + 1)
(-1/2)(-1/2 - 1)(-1/2 + 1) < 0
(-1/2)(-3/2)(1/2) < 0
(3/8) < 0
False, so (1) does not hold for -1 < a < 0
** At this point, since (Supposition 1) can be either greater than 0 or less than 0 (depending on chosen a), we know than (1) is insufficient for our Test. Although because it's pertinant to later discussion, I'll also solve for the other 2 areas (3. & 4. from above) **
3. Suppose (1/2); a (a - 1)(a + 1)
(1/2)(1/2 - 1)(1/2 + 1) < 0
(1/2)(-1/2)(3/2) < 0
(-3/8) < 0
True, so (1) holds for 0 < a < 1
4. Suppose a = 2; a (a - 1)(a + 1)
(2)(2 - 1)(2 + 1) < 0
(2)(1)(3) < 0
6 < 0
False, so (1) does not hold for 1 < a
(Supposition 2) 1 - a^2 > 0
Again, let's set it equal to zero to know which areas we need to test.
1 - (a)^2 = 0
(a)^2 - 1 = 0 Multiplied through by -1
(a - 1)(a + 1) = 0
a = 1 or a = -1
Since we have two values, we have three areas to test:
1. When a < -1
2. When -1 < a < 1
3. When 1 < a
1. Suppose a = -2; (a - 1)(a + 1)
(-2 - 1)(-2 + 1) < 0
(-3)(-1) < 0
3 < 0
False, so supposition (2) does not hold for a < -1.
2. Suppose 0; (a - 1)(a + 1)
(0 - 1)(0 + 1) < 0
(-1)(1) < 0
-1 < 0
True, so (2) does hold for -1 < a < 1.
** At this point, since (Supposition 2) can be either greater than 0 or less than 0 (depending on chosen a), we know than (2) is insufficient for our Test. Although because it's pertinant to later discussion, I'll also solve for the other 1 area (3. from above) **
3. Suppose 2; (a - 1)(a + 1)
(2 - 1)(2 + 1) < 0
(1)(3) < 0
3 < 0
False, so (2) does not hold for 1 < a.
Since we know that both suppositions and insufficient alone, we can now look at both together. If both together are true, where do their solutions overlap?
If a < -1, (1) is < 0 and (2) is > 0. This conflicts, so the solution to both cannot be in this area.
If a > -1, (1) is > 0 and (2) is < 0. This conflicts, so the solution to both cannot be in this area.
If -1 < a < 0, (1) is > 0 and (2) is < 0 (because we've seen that (2) is < 0 for all values between -1 and 1 non inclusive). This conflicts, so the solution to both cannot be in this area.
If 0 < a < 1, (1) is < 0 and (2) is < 0. This agrees, so the value if both suppositions are true must fall into this range. And since this solution allows us to answer our Test (a > 0?), we know that both (1) and (2) are sufficient for the Test.
Answer C.
PS: This is probably WAY more than you'll have time to do on the test, but it illustrates the steps in the most detail for your understanding. It is definitely not the most efficient solution.
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
s a > 0?
1. a^3 - a < 0
(a-1) a (a+1) < 0
INSUF
2. 1 - a^2 > 0[/quote]
(1-a) ( 1+a ) > 0
INSUF
Together we know that (a+1)(a-1) < 0 SO a > 0
C
1. a^3 - a < 0
(a-1) a (a+1) < 0
INSUF
2. 1 - a^2 > 0[/quote]
(1-a) ( 1+a ) > 0
INSUF
Together we know that (a+1)(a-1) < 0 SO a > 0
C
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
yes.cunu wrote:BuckeyeT,
thanks alot. great explanation.
buckeyeT's explanation is a very good synopsis of the standard method for solving quadratic inequalities.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron












