BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Probability Question

Expert replies
by abhijeetsinghai » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:04 am
Six boys and six girls sit slong s line alternatively in x ways and along a circle in y ways(again alternatively) , then find the relation between x and y .

a. x = 12y
b. x = 2y
c. x = 6y
d. x= 8y

OA:[spoiler]a

please tell me the approach.thanx !![/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Uri » Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:24 am
Scenario I: Straight line arrangement
6 boys can sit in 6 seats in 6! ways
6 girls can sit in 6 seats in 6! ways
Either of the groups can take the first seat.
So, the total no. of possible arrangements is 2*6!*6!
This is x.

Scenario II: Circular arrangement

Let us first offer the sit to a girl! Once this girl sits, the rest of the girls can sit in 5! ways, keeping one seat vacant between each one of them.
Once the girls are seated, the boys can be arranged in 6 seats in 6! ways.
Since this is a circular arrangement, we don't have to consider whether the boy sits first or the girl.
So, the number of arrangements= 5! * 6!
This is y.

Therefore x/y= 12
or x=12y

Can anyone verify whether the above explanation is correct? I am very weak in Permutation & Combination. But still, somehow gathered enough courage to try this problem :) Please help :!:
Join the discussion

by ontopofit » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:49 pm
yes it's correct...besides there is direct formula that number of permutations in circular arr. is (n-1)!.....i.e in this case y=11! and x=12!.hence x=12y.

however, i appreciate the way u have dun it. its better not to depend too much on direct formulas.
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:47 pm
hi uri..
i guess the explanation was perfect...
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:41 am
ontopofit wrote:yes it's correct...besides there is direct formula that number of permutations in circular arr. is (n-1)!.....i.e in this case y=11! and x=12!.hence x=12y.

however, i appreciate the way u have dun it. its better not to depend too much on direct formulas.
Some one pls correct me if I am wrong.
I think ontopofit's approach is incorrect, but since we are looking at a ratio, one can arrive at the same answer as long the same method is used to obtain the value of x and y.
I think Uri's approach is correct.
Join the discussion