BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

gmatpre-4

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by piyush_nitt » Sun Dec 28, 2008 12:47 pm
IMO B
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:43 pm
IMO C

We already have "although" in non underlined part to show the contrast, therefore we dont need "while" to show contrast again.

Eliminate - D & E

option A - that there would be a resurgence - awkward + wordy

Option B - "it" has no antecedent.

Hence C.

OA?
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:00 pm
Agree with PC

IMO C
Join the discussion

by acecoolan » Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:52 pm
C.

Same reasoning as pc

-A
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:22 am
I can see the 2/3 splits is for the test of conjunction and vs while

and seems preferable, as though there is some sort of contrast...price rise is because of temporary reasons and it didn't necessarily mean a surge in inflation..

so out of 1 2 3:

2 is out

what abt 3: do u agree foreshadow a surge...

I think though lengthy 1 is correct...comments

and grammatical point to kill A vs C...

I bet A.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1