BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Education

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

Education

by imskpwr » Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:26 am
A recent article stated that only 5.5% of American colleges grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts. Citing this, a reader wrote to lament that this was further evidence of the decline of academic rigor in American post high school education.

Which of the following is an assumption on the part of the reader?

The percentage of American colleges granting liberal arts degrees would continue to drop.

All colleges should grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts.

Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does not involve as much academic rigor as liberal arts training.

Academic rigor is the most important aspect of post high school education.

Of the colleges that do not grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts, many granted fewer than a quarter of their degrees in the liberal arts

Please explain the answer.
Source and OA after discussion
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:39 am
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:640

by Ankur87 » Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:19 am
IMO : C
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:10 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by SmartAssJun » Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:37 pm
Assumption that the academic rigor in liberals art> other fields of studies leads the reader
to conclude that less degrees in liberal arts granted means less rigor.
So C.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 10:07 pm
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members

by das.ashmita » Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:04 pm
Hi imskpwr
A recent article stated that only 5.5% of American colleges grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts. Citing this, a reader wrote to lament that this was further evidence of the decline of academic rigor in American post high school education.

Which of the following is an assumption on the part of the reader?
The percentage of American colleges granting liberal arts degrees would continue to drop. - out of scope

All colleges should grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts. - not an assumption for sure

Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does not involve as much academic rigor as liberal arts training. - Only on the basis of the liberal arts, the author is saying that there is a decline in academic rigor. He clearly assumes that the other trainings have nothing to do with it.

Academic rigor is the most important aspect of post high school education. - exaggerated and out of scope

Of the colleges that do not grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts, many granted fewer than a quarter of their degrees in the liberal arts - out of scope

IMO C
let me know if I am wrong.[/quote]
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by imskpwr » Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:53 am
das.ashmita wrote:Hi imskpwr

All colleges should grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts. - not an assumption for sure
I understand the problem and my mistake, but need to see others strategy to better navigate through such silly errors.
what made you reject this for an assumption?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 10:07 pm
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members

by das.ashmita » Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:53 am
Hi imskpwr

In the question above:
premise - only 5.5% of American colleges grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts
conclusion - decline of academic rigor in American post high school education.

We need to find an assumption here which is correlating the premise and the conclusion.
All colleges should grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts
option B here is more like a solution considering the argument to be true.

I hope it clears your doubt. :)
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by imskpwr » Wed Oct 03, 2012 7:27 pm
U have considered Case1
Case:1

premise - only 5.5% of American colleges grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts

Assumption: Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does not involve as much academic rigor as liberal arts training.

conclusion - decline of academic rigor in American post high school education.

The assumption is not sufficient to validate the argument.

Case:2
premise - only 5.5% of American colleges grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts

Assumption:1
All colleges should grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts

Assumption:2
Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does not involve as much academic rigor as liberal arts training.

conclusion - decline of academic rigor in American post high school education.
I think both the statements are necessary assumption and hence both are required to validate the argument. Each of them can be taken up as Assumption.

What do you think Ashmita das ?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 10:07 pm
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members

by das.ashmita » Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:52 pm
Hi imskpwr

I understand your confusion. I re read option B and it can be a contender.
But, in GMAT we don't have the liberty to choose 2 options. :)
So, we need to choose the best.

B talks about "all colleges". I feel its extreme and is talking more on a broader level. Thus, can be eliminated.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:38 am
imskpwr wrote:
Case:2
premise - only 5.5% of American colleges grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts

Assumption:1
All colleges should grant the majority of their degrees in the liberal arts

Assumption:2
Most post-secondary scientific, engineering, and vocational training does not involve as much academic rigor as liberal arts training.

conclusion - decline of academic rigor in American post high school education.
I think both the statements are necessary assumption and hence both are required to validate the argument. Each of them can be taken up as Assumption.
here, assumption 1 is not a valid assumption. Take this analogy :

All successful 750+ GMAT scorers spend more than 2 months in their preparation. So, if John want to score 770 in GMAT, he must spend more than 2 months in preparing for GMAT.

Assumption 1 - John should spend more than 2 months.... - this is not the correct assumption.

for an assumption to work - we have to look for a statement that works within the core of the argument.

Hope this helps !!
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by imskpwr » Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:48 am
avik.ch wrote: here, assumption 1 is not a valid assumption. Take this analogy :

All successful 750+ GMAT scorers spend more than 2 months in their preparation. So, if John want to score 770 in GMAT, he must spend more than 2 months in preparing for GMAT.

Assumption 1 - John should spend more than 2 months.... - this is not the correct assumption.

for an assumption to work - we have to look for a statement that works within the core of the argument.

Hope this helps !!
What I thought:

A recent MOM stated that Only 15% of applml contract provide the majority of its provisions in the High Sea Sales. Citing this, Avik spoke to mock that this was evidence of the decline of commercial rigor in Applml contract.

All contracts should provide the majority of their provisions in the High Sea Sales.
It is only "applml contract". So if it has to work as an ASSUMPTION it must be worded as "all applml contracts".
Further, "should" is incorrect for an assumption.
I hope this is the only reason here.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:09 am
Thanked: 2 times

by akashkumar1987 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:12 pm
C is the answer
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:06 am
imskpwr wrote:
What I thought:

A recent MOM stated that Only 15% of applml contract provide the majority of its provisions in the High Sea Sales. Citing this, Avik spoke to mock that this was evidence of the decline of commercial rigor in Applml contract.

All contracts should provide the majority of their provisions in the High Sea Sales.
It is only "applml contract". So if it has to work as an ASSUMPTION it must be worded as "all applml contracts".
Further, "should" is incorrect for an assumption.
I hope this is the only reason here.

yes, this is not an assumption of the above argument - "should" makes it inappropriate.

For more on this, refer the analogy from OG-12 # 76 ( option A and B - how "should" is inappropriate)

hope this helps !!
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 2:27 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by Sapana » Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:35 pm
What is the OA for this question? I still am confused with the discussions!! Any Experts???
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 3:04 am

by Practicegmat » Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:33 am
what is the OA ?
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1