Tough modifier question..

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:25 am
Thanked: 1 times

Tough modifier question..

by rjain84 » Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:45 am
Medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations, meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy, communicated their interpretive understanding of the texts they illustrated.

A) Medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations, meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy, communicated

B) Through their manuscript illuminations, meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy, medieval monks communicated

C) Through their manuscript illuminations, with which they meticulously embellished elaborate calligraphy, medieval monks communicated

D) Meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy, medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations communicated

E) Medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations, meticulously embellished them and communicated

OA: C
Source: Veritas Prep


The sentence has stumped me completely. Experts please explain how to reach at the correct answer choice for this question.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:53 am
When it comes to modifier questions - or really any SC question - it helps to start by identifying the core of your sentence: what are the subject(s) and verb(s), and how do the other sentence elements relate to them?

Medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations, meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy, communicated their interpretive understanding of the texts they illustrated.

The core of the sentence here is "monks communicated." The other pieces are modifying: "through their manuscript illuminations" tells us how they communicated, as does "meticulously embellishing." Because they're telling us how, these are both adverbial modifiers.

The problem, though, is that we can't stack two modifiers in a row if they're modifying the same thing. Effectively, what we have is:
Subject, adverbial modifier, adverbial modifier, verb...
We need to conjoin these modifiers (if they're modifying the same thing), or change one of them to modify something else.


A) Medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations, meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy, communicated
Two adverbial modifiers modifying the same thing.

B) Through their manuscript illuminations, meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy, medieval monks communicated
Same issue here - the modifiers were simply moved to the beginning of the sentence, but it's still two adverbial modifiers modifying the same thing.

C) Through their manuscript illuminations, with which they meticulously embellished elaborate calligraphy, medieval monks communicated
Here, the idea of "embellishing" has been changed. The "with which" tells us that this is now modifying the word that came before it: "illuminations." It's a modifier nested within another modifier - in other words, they're modifying two different things. CORRECT

D) Meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy, medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations communicated
Here, the modifiers aren't directly in a row, but they're still both adverbial modifiers trying to modify the same thing.

E) Medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations, meticulously embellished them and communicated
This sentence now makes "embellished" a verb rather than a modifier. This fixes the modifier issue, but it changes the meaning. "Embellished" and "communicated" are not parallel ideas.
Furthermore, the use of "them" is incorrect. We can't use "their" to refer to monks and "them" to refer to the manuscripts in the same sentence.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:55 am
Here's another example of the two-modifiers-in-a-row rule: https://www.beatthegmat.com/tricky-modif ... tml#637463
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:25 am
Thanked: 1 times

by rjain84 » Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:20 pm
Thanks Ceilidh for the wonderful explanation and directing me to a similar question. I have a follow-up question though.

How do we ascertain that the modifier is modifying what?

In the original sentence above, for example, phrase "meticulously embellishing the elaborate calligraphy" may modify the noun "manuscript illuminations" as well. In that case we won't have back-to-back modifiers modifying the same thing.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:33 pm
Great question! When it comes to modifiers, we want to think about 2 things - meaning and structure. From a meaning perspective, you're sort of right the illuminations are being modified (as we see in C). But if "embellishing" were modifying "illuminations," that would imply that the illuminations were doing the embellishing, which doesn't make sense.

From a structural perspective as well, we know that "embellishing" can't be a noun modifier. When a present participle comes after a comma, it modifies the entire clause before the comma:
I told a story, embellishing it with details that weren't quite true.
Here, the participle is describing how I told the story.

If a present participle is used without a comma, though, then it's a noun modifier:
The girl embellishing the truth is nothing more than a liar.
Here, "embellishing" is simply describing the girl.

Does this clarify?
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:25 am
Thanked: 1 times

by rjain84 » Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:42 pm
Ah. Silly me. Always keeps on forgetting the function of the participle phrases. Thank you very much Ceilidh for taking the time and clarifying my doubts. Really appreciate it!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:13 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:700

by hemant_rajput » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:36 am
1. Wrong: Modifier, modifier, thing being modified.
2. Right: Modifier, thing being modified, modifier.

That's what you said right. In Option D 2nd is the case, then why did you eliminate that option? Can you please elaborate this dilemma?
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:10 pm
Followed by:2 members

by anukrati » Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:32 pm
hemant_rajput wrote:1. Wrong: Modifier, modifier, thing being modified.
2. Right: Modifier, thing being modified, modifier.

That's what you said right. In Option D 2nd is the case, then why did you eliminate that option? Can you please elaborate this dilemma?
Hi Hemant, if you closely observe then Option D is not that case.

Option D is the sentence fragment.

main verb "communicated" is in modifier phrase not the main sentence.
Modifiers are always to give extra information and hence they will never have main verb.

Had their been a comma after illuminations then it might be the same as second case.

I hope this helps.

Thanks

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:10 pm
Followed by:2 members

by anukrati » Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:34 pm
Hi Celeidh

In the referred post you have stated as below :

1. Wrong: Modifier, modifier, thing being modified,
2. Right: Modifier, thing being modified, modifier,

So if we would have had answer choice as the second option :
Modifier, thing being modified, modifier,

Then this option would have been correct in this problem as well?

• Page 1 of 1