BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Doctor's conclusion

Expert replies
by ashish.arora » Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:11 pm
Doctor: Research shows that adolescents who play video games on a regular basis are three times as likely to develop carpal tunnel syndrome as are adolescents who do not play video games. Federal legislation that prohibits the sale of video games to minors would help curb this painful wrist condition among adolescents.

The doctor’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. The majority of federal legislators would vote for a bill that prohibits the sale of video games to minors.

B. Not all adolescents who play video games on a regular basis suffer from carpal tunnel syndrome.

C. Playing video games is the only way an adolescent can develop carpal tunnel syndrome.

D. Most parents would refuse to purchase video games for their adolescent children.

E. The regular playing of video games by adolescents does not produce such beneficial effects as better hand-eye coordination and improved reaction time.

My Answer is C but the answer given is D.

I think the answer could only be D, if question is framed as:

The Fedral legislation’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by stop@800 » Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:46 pm
The answer is C only.
IMO There is no point being D.

Also, there is no "Fedral legislation’s conclusion" in the argument.
Join the discussion

by Mani_mba » Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:12 pm
C cannot be correct.

The passage says, "adolescents who play video games on a regular basis are three times as likely to develop carpal tunnel syndrome as are adolescents who do not play video games."

It can be implied that "Adolescents who do not play video games also can develop carpel tunnel syndrome"
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:19 pm
I would go with "D"

C is incorrect

C. Playing video games is the only way an adolescent can develop carpal tunnel syndrome.

This is not assumed in the passage and strong language also makes it a bad answer choice.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by Jatinder » Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:11 pm
its clearly D

Look closely @ the conclusion:

Federal legislation that prohibits the sale of video games to minors would help curb this painful wrist condition

Well! somebody else can buy the games and give them to minors.

@C : lets negate it:

Playing video games is not the only way an adolescent can develop carpal tunnel syndrome.

now how does this affect the conclusion that federal legislation would help curb this condition?
So it can't be C :-)
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Tue Oct 28, 2008 7:23 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by ashish.arora » Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:22 am
The Answer is D. I got the point. Thanks everybody!!!
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:06 pm
Jatinder wrote:its clearly D

Look closely @ the conclusion:

Federal legislation that prohibits the sale of video games to minors would help curb this painful wrist condition

Well! somebody else can buy the games and give them to minors.

@C : lets negate it:

Playing video games is not the only way an adolescent can develop carpal tunnel syndrome.

now how does this affect the conclusion that federal legislation would help curb this condition?
So it can't be C :-)
Fantastic reasoning!

Let's take a step back for a moment.

Here, the Doctor's conclusion is a prediction. Every time someone makes a prediction, she's assuming that there are no unexpected obstacles to the prediction coming true.

(d) clearly removes a potential obstacle - someone buying the video game for the minor.

Let's go one step further with Kaplan's denial test and see what happens when we apply it to (d):
It is not true that most parents would refuse to purchase video games for their adolescent children.
or, simplified:
Most parents would buy video games for their kids.
Well, if parents would buy the games, then how would banning the sale of games to minors curb carpal tunnel syndrome? It clearly wouldn't.

Since the denial of (d) wrecks the argument, (d) is an assumption.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by ashish.arora » Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:54 pm
Thanks Stuart!! Kaplan strategy of negation works here....
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:56 am
Fedral would be able to prohibit , if sales of video games goes down and if u negate D, that parents will buy the video games. As a result, sales will not go down. So, It makes conclusion invalid.So D.
Join the discussion

SOLUTION to assumption question

by tanviet » Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:53 am
from reading and practicing I create SOLUTION TO ASSUMPTION QUESTION (STAQ). Pls, make your contribution to my small thesis.

assumption must be.

1. in context of evidence (pls, see Critical reasoning 101 to master this)
2.support conclusion
3.pass negation test (see Critical REsoning Bible)
4.remember Supporter and Defender model to realize assumption fast.(see Critical Reasoning Bible)

answer support conclusion but do not pass negation test is attractive but wrong. Practice to realize this kind of tricky answer.

answer support conclution but out of context of evidence is attractive but wrong. practice to realize this tricky one.

pls, contribute your idea to this.
Join the discussion

this is very good question!

by kiennguyen » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:03 pm
hi guy! I'm confused what kind of structure " help curb" is. i never see this before!
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:56 pm
D seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion