Movie viewers

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:01 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

Movie viewers

by sushbis » Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:23 am
If 60% of a set of people watched a movie X and 75% watched a movie Y and among them they watched only these two movies, then what is the least number of people who watched both?
Source: — Problem Solving |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Kuwait
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by saleem.kh » Mon Jun 27, 2011 5:53 am
Answer: 35% least watched both.

Explanation:

As per my understandings, I used matrix to find required percentage. If 60% matched X, then 40% not watched X. Same, if 75% watched Y, then 25% not watched Y. Everybody watched either X or Y, then just put 0 in No-X and No-Y box and balance rest boxes, you will get 35 as minimum people who watched both X or Y.

Please let me know, if I'm wrong.
Attachments
image.png

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:20 am
sushbis wrote:If 60% of a set of people watched a movie X and 75% watched a movie Y and among them they watched only these two movies, then what is the least number of people who watched both?

The question asks for least number of people who watched both, not the least percent of people who watched both.

As percent, n (X & Y) = n (X) + n (Y) - n (X or Y) = 60 + 75 - 100 = 35

Then, look for the least positive integer that could represent 35 percent of some number, and 7 is the best answer, which represents 35 percent of 20.

My answer is [spoiler]7[/spoiler].
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:01 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by sushbis » Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:59 am
Good reply. Kudos!