BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

boat downstream

Expert replies
by neoreaves » Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:30 pm
A crew can row a certain course up stream in 84 minutes; they can row the same course down stream in 9 minutes less than they can row in still water. How long would they take to row down with the stream.

a) 45 minutes
b) 63 minutes
c) 60 minutes
d) 19 minutes
e) 12 minutes


I know how to form the algebraic equations for this. My question is : Is there a faster way to solve this ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sanju09 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:35 am
neoreaves wrote:A crew can row a certain course up stream in 84 minutes; they can row the same course down stream in 9 minutes less than they can row in still water. How long would they take to row down with the stream.

a) 45 minutes
b) 63 minutes
c) 60 minutes
d) 19 minutes
e) 12 minutes


I know how to form the algebraic equations for this. My question is : Is there a faster way to solve this ?
This question is unfathomable algebraically. So there is no point in forming the algebraic equations for this. Only trick and that again in the presence of the flawlessly prejudiced answer choices, may probably work here.

If the crew can row the course up stream in 84 minutes, then the given distance is a certain multiple of 84. Hence, if the time taken to row down with the stream is an integer (as the choices suggest); then this time must also be a factor of 84. No choice other than [spoiler]E[/spoiler] is a factor of 84.

[spoiler]E[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:49 am
based on this 75 can also be a multiple of d. But its still a multiple! doesnt give us anything ...Moreover, E is not the OA
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:06 am
neoreaves wrote:based on this 75 can also be a multiple of d. But its still a multiple! doesnt give us anything ...Moreover, E is not the OA
I didn't get you here. What is d, and how can 75 be a multiple of this? What's OA then, would you say it's [spoiler]B[/spoiler]? Do you believe that forming algebraic equations may solve this for you?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by ajith » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:19 am
Let me try with equations Let the distance be D
stream speed - s and boat speed d

D/(d-s) =84
D/d- D/(d+s) = 9

We need to find out D/(d+s)

D= 84(d-s)
D = 9 (d+s)*d/s

9 (d+s)*d = 84(d-s)s
9(d^2+sd) = 84 (sd - s^2)

3d^2 - 25 sd + 28s^2 =0

(d-7s)(3d-4s) =0
Since d is greater than s
d=7s
d/s =7

D = 9 (d+s)*d/s
D= 9* (d+s)*7

[spoiler]D/(d+s) = 63, B ( I was not able to solve it non-algebraically, posting the solution for the benefit of others)[/spoiler]
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:33 am
ajith wrote:Let me try with equations Let the distance be D
stream speed - s and boat speed d

D/(d-s) =84
D/d- D/(d+s) = 9

We need to find out D/(d+s)

D= 84(d-s)
D = 9 (d+s)*d/s

9 (d+s)*d = 84(d-s)s
9(d^2+sd) = 84 (sd - s^2)

3d^2 - 25 sd + 28s^2 =0

(d-7s)(3d-4s) =0
Since d is greater than s
d=7s
d/s =7

D = 9 (d+s)*d/s
D= 9* (d+s)*7

[spoiler]D/(d+s) = 63, B ( I was not able to solve it non-algebraically, posting the solution for the benefit of others)[/spoiler]
If d > s, then 3 d = 4 s can also be taken into account, which proves E to be the answer then. Only one thing about the required time in the question can be said with certainty, and that is that it is less than 75 minutes. Algebra won't work here, I have told them.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by yeahdisk » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:57 am
Time Upstream = Tu = 84
Time Downstream = Td = ?

Effect of flow Upstream = Fu = ?
Effect of flow downstream = Fd = 9

Effect of flow is proportional to Time Taken, therefore:

(Tu/Fu) = (Td/Fd)

If no flow, it would take the same amount of time in both directions. Therefore:

Tu-Fu = Td+Fd

Substituting in all of the options gives b as the only possible answer.

Even this trial & error method took me a good few minutes - I'd hate to get this question!
Last edited by yeahdisk on Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:21 am
yeahdisk wrote:Time Upstream = Tu = 84
Time Downstream = Td = ?

Effect of flow Upstream = Fu = ?
Effect of flow downstream = Fd = 9

Effect of flow is proportional to Time Taken, therefore:

(Tu/Fu) = (Td/Fd) __________(1)

If no flow, it would take the same amount of time in both directions. Therefore:

Tu-Fu = Td+Fu__________(2)

Substituting in all of the options gives b as the only possible answer.

Even this trial & error method took me a good few minutes - I'd hate to get this question!
On which hypothesis the bold (1) is based, I'm not sure. What pick-n-plug policy was used with the bold (2), only yeahdisk knows. I only wish yeahdisk to be sure there's no typo in his work.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by yeahdisk » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:37 am
1) Effect of flow must be proportional to the time taken. Pretty straight forward.

2) Straight forward conclusion.
...what pick & plug policy...
Take answer a) 45 as a possible for Td.

Plugging this into equation 1 (remember, we already know Tu and Fd) means Fu would have to equal 16.8. Decimals obviously won't work with equation 2.

So, try answer b) 63 as a possible for TD. Plugging into equation 1 gives us a Fu of 12.

Subbing into equation 2 gives 84 = 63 + 12 + 9. Which works.

The same method disproves c) d) and e).

If you have a quicker way please share

*edit* ok it doesn't actually disprove E, so using my method could only lead you to 2 possible answers. hmmm.
Last edited by yeahdisk on Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:49 am
yeahdisk wrote:1) Effect of flow must be proportional to the time taken. Pretty straight forward.

2) Straight forward conclusion.
...what pick & plug policy...
Take answer a) 45 as a possible for Td.

Plugging this into equation 1 (remember, we already know Tu and Fd) means Fu would have to equal 16.8. Decimals obviously won't work with equation 2.

So, try answer b) 63 as a possible for TD. Plugging into equation 1 gives us a Fu of 12.

Subbing into equation 2 gives 84 = 63 + 12 + 9. Which works.

The same method disproves c) d) and e).

If you have a quicker way please share
I'm sorry for still not getting you so properly. If Fu = 12 and the bold (2) has no typo, then [spoiler]C[/spoiler] becomes the answer.

Let neoreaves share the OA first, then I would definitely hammer my mind out for you.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by yeahdisk » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:56 am
Plugging 60 into formula 1 gives us a Fu of 12.6

Plugging 60 and 12.6 into formula 2 doesn't compute.

I agree with you in seeing the OA though; I think my method would lead you to 2 answers:[spoiler] b) or e)[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:05 am
yeahdisk wrote:Plugging 60 into formula 1 gives us a Fu of 12.6

Plugging 60 and 12.6 into formula 2 doesn't compute.

I agree with you in seeing the OA though; I think my method would lead you to 2 answers:[spoiler] b) or e)[/spoiler]
Please try to get what I'm insisting on

Tu-Fu = Td+Fu__________(2)

and that

Time Upstream = Tu = 84
Time Downstream = Td = ?

Effect of flow Upstream = Fu = 12 (if taken)
Effect of flow downstream = Fd = 9

now, the bold (2) becomes

84 - 12 = Td + 12

or Td = 60

You have one more chance to admit there's no typo in bold (2).
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by yeahdisk » Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:22 am
yes there's a typo.

good work.
Join the discussion