Recommended Pacing strategy and Running out of time!

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:34 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members
I was once thought taking a GMAT course that it can be good strategy to spend more time with the earlier questions (1-10) in both quant and verbal, and then accelerate during the test.
This might be true, since the brain gets more tired as minutes ticks, so maybe it is more safe to spend more time in the beginning of the test??

However, I have taken the real GMAT once and plenty of CATs and every single time I end up with running out of time so I have to quickly random guess the last questions.

For example on the real test, from what I can recall, I had to random guess:
Q: ~5 last questions
V: ~6-10 last questions.

I don't know for sure, but probably those last minute random guesses in each section cause severe penalty in my final score.

According to the first thing above, "spend more time with early questions", I have use a timing strategy like:

(note: time given is what the timer should show after the greater specified problem number)

Quant:
01-10: 45:00
11-20: 25:00
21-30: 15:00
31-37: 10:00

Verbal:
01-10: 45:00
11-20: 20:00
21-30: 10:00
31-41: 10:00

my final score has been below 50%-tile.

however, now when I think about it maybe I should re-think about my timing strategy too. maybe this strategy is one of the main causes of why I usually end up with running out of time (meaning random guessing) at the end of the test.

Accelerating during the test might sound easier than it really is, I mean "how much fast can I make my brain go" without making extra careless mistakes?


Grateful to any comments of the timing above, and suggestions if there are other more recommended approaches!
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:28 am
more than pacing i will prefer making some areas strong and find out Q that r taking too much time. may be i will leave and guess a few Q to catch up.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:30 am
The first ten questions strategy is mostly a myth. It is based on the fact that the test does not adapt at the very beginning but rather takes an initial impression of your ability and begins to adapt with question 11 (or so).

However, this is just an initial impression of your ability. There is no way to fool the test. Getting 10 out of 10 right at the beginning will not save you if you miss most of the remaining questions.

It is true, however, that you do not want to do "poorly" on the first 10. For example, if you get less than 5 of the first 10 correct you will have limited the score that you can get on the test. The initial impression of your ability will be low enough that you would need to get just about every question from 11 on correct in order to really raise your score.

So the truth is someone in between. You do not want to bomb on the first 10 so it is worth a few seconds extra and a little more focus. However, it is not worth taking even an extra 5 minutes on the first ten questions. Frankly, research shows that you will not likely get more than one additional question correct by spending all of that time (your time standards show you spending lots of time on the first 10 - way more than 15 minutes - way too much).

Here is some other information from an earlier post that I wrote which may help you.

"Many people base their "strategies" on the fear of missing questions. This leads them to the following approach - when they encounter a strange and difficult problem they become focused and alert and put maximum time and attention into this problem. Then when they see a problem that they can get right they try to not only get it right but do so in the shortest possible time so that they can make up the time they just devoted to the really difficult problem.

The better way to approach the quant section is this:

When you see a question that you can get right - devote the attention and the time that it takes to get it right. There is a difference between struggling for 3 minutes to come up with a strategy for a question you find very difficult (this is usually a mistake) and spending three minutes doing what it takes to ensure that you get a particular question (that you know you can solve) correct. It is a matter of approach to the test and it can make a huge difference. Do not try to steal 20 seconds from questions that you can get right only to hand that time over to a question that you will likely miss anyway.

Here are two things to think about:

1) If you do not have a specific strategy for solving a quant problem in about 1 minute and 15 seconds then you will want to choose from the viable answer choices and move on. It is precisely this type of question - where you have no strategy for a long time - that can sap the time and energy right out of your quant section on the test.

2) Set a time standard for yourself - I like to say that after question 25 I should have 25 minutes left (for the last 12 questions). If I am 5 minutes behind, I will just skip (randomly guess) at the next two problem solving questions I see. This will bring me back to the right pace. This is a better strategy than the alternative of " I can catch back up." Be careful here, trying to catch up usually means saving 20 or 30 seconds per question and we already know this is a mistake. Better to sacrifice two or three questions for the good of the test.

Finally, focus on getting questions right rather than on fearing that you might get some wrong. You will get questions wrong. But if you get say, 25-30 right out of the 37 you will be over the 90th percentile and this strategy will be one that gives you a consistent score."


Here is an article that I wrote that might help you to think about these things.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/01/ ... n-the-gmat
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:52 am
Epic post, David - I've always loved hearing your take on strategic pacing!

Just to tack on a few things:

1) David's suggestion of intentionally and immediately guessing on a question to catch back up in time is pretty sharp. I call that "punting for field position" - rather than run the risk of making careless, rushed mistakes to save 20-30 seconds on each of 4-5 questions, take your quick guess (and still a 20% chance of getting it right) on a question so that you can maximize your correct answers on those questions that you know you can do well. Here's an article about that:

https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2010/10 ... for-field/

1a) I got this from David, too, but thought it was incredibly smart - the GMAT is known to have (and will admit to having) a pretty severe penalty for not finishing a section, so the logic follows that it is unlikely that the last question or two will be unscored, experimental questions. The GMAT wouldn't give you a cop-out on poor pacing by allowing the last couple questions not to count - that would be counterproductive to the scoring system. So you can almost certainly count on the last two questions counting...which means that if you know you're going to have to guess on 2-3 questions, you want to burn those guesses earlier in the test when there's at least a fair chance that the question simply will not count.

2) That myth of the first 10 questions counting more is pretty incredible in its staying power...the Official Guide for GMAT Review, the www.mba.com blog, and other official sources all go out of their way to debunk the myth, yet it's one of the first questions asked in pretty much any class or seminar I teach and students will even debate me on it ("Well, I read on an internet forum from an anonymous poster that it's true, so there..."). Fascinating.

To better understand the GMAT scoring system, this article may help: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2010/08 ... algorithm/. When you consider that random guessing offers a 20% chance that simply anyone can answer a 700+ level question correctly, it's pretty evident that the scoring algorithm needs to adapt to false-positives and false-negatives, so it's a much more nuanced system than most quick-reference charts can make it out to be.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:34 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by bkw » Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:28 pm
First, Thanks David and Brian for getting back to me!

Conclusion:
-Try to spend a couple of extra seconds for each of the first ten, but NOT a minute extra for each!
-When behind schedule, rather skip in the middle than at the very end.
-Better to skip, and go normal, than to rush.
-When not having a clue how to solve a problem after maximum a minute, guess and continue.

I think that are a few things worth remember. Let me know if I missed anything...

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:34 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by bkw » Fri Feb 04, 2011 2:51 pm
Btw, I read on a knewton class that it "was like that in the PAST", that the first ten did actually mean more to the score than other problems. Thus, one was recommended to spend more time with the first problems, but when everyone figured this out they fixed this on the test. Is this true? :-) maybe it is origin of the myth...

however, i must committed pacing suicide spending ~30min for the first 10 Q questions if it now never really helped me :-(