-
gmat_perfect
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:14 members
Beta Corporation claims that it no longer has enough work for the 60 computer data-entry workers that it is laying off. These workers have heard, however, that the company is buying 100 new computers. So the workers concluded that the company's real reason for laying them off is to fill their jobs with lower-paid workers.
Which of the following, if true, would most undermine the workers' conclusion?
(A) Most of the workers being laid off know how to enter data on a number of different computer systems.
=> It is irrelevant because it does not have any impact.
(B) Orders for almost all of Beta Corporation products have increased over the past year.
=> Data entry does not have any relation with the production of the company.
(C) A recent memorandum from the president of Beta Corporation requested that all data generated by the company be stored in computerized form.
=> Here is the explanation why the company purchased the 100 new computer. If it is true, then there is no chance to hire new cheap labor.
(D) Beta Corporation's computer data-entry workers are more experienced and hence more highly paid than people doing comparable work in other companies.
=> So what?
(E) Beta Corporation's new computers will allow its current management and sales staff to perform many of the tasks that the data-entry workers were previously doing.
=> If these newly bought computers are used in work, then there is a chance of hiring new employees. And if they hire new employees, there is a chance of hiring cheap labor for data entry. It will finally strengthen the conclusion drawn by the employees.
[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]
Please see my explanation. Where am I missing? I think E is strengthening the conclusion of the workers, who think that the company is hiring cheap labor.
Since the question stem says 'if true', we can not challenge the answer choice.
Thanks.
Which of the following, if true, would most undermine the workers' conclusion?
(A) Most of the workers being laid off know how to enter data on a number of different computer systems.
=> It is irrelevant because it does not have any impact.
(B) Orders for almost all of Beta Corporation products have increased over the past year.
=> Data entry does not have any relation with the production of the company.
(C) A recent memorandum from the president of Beta Corporation requested that all data generated by the company be stored in computerized form.
=> Here is the explanation why the company purchased the 100 new computer. If it is true, then there is no chance to hire new cheap labor.
(D) Beta Corporation's computer data-entry workers are more experienced and hence more highly paid than people doing comparable work in other companies.
=> So what?
(E) Beta Corporation's new computers will allow its current management and sales staff to perform many of the tasks that the data-entry workers were previously doing.
=> If these newly bought computers are used in work, then there is a chance of hiring new employees. And if they hire new employees, there is a chance of hiring cheap labor for data entry. It will finally strengthen the conclusion drawn by the employees.
[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]
Please see my explanation. Where am I missing? I think E is strengthening the conclusion of the workers, who think that the company is hiring cheap labor.
Since the question stem says 'if true', we can not challenge the answer choice.
Thanks.
