A former director of CIA

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:10 am
Thanked: 13 times

A former director of CIA

by shekhar.kataria » Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:38 am
A former director of CIA has said that the surveillance capabilties of the United States satellites would enable a skilled photographic interpreter to distinguish between Guernsey and Hereford cows grazing in a meadow.

A. Between Guernsey and Hereford cows grazing
B. between Guenseys and Herefords cows that graze.

Confused between these two options.OE A but why B is wrong Please explain your answers.
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 6:12 am
Thanked: 2 times

by blackjack » Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:47 am
'grazing in a meadow' is a participial phrase which modifies cows, but cows that graze in a meadow seems to suggest that 'they are a special type of cows that graze at a meadow'. I guess, that's a change in meaning.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 28 times
GMAT Score:770

by goalevan » Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:50 am
Choice A is more concise, and choice B actually changes the meaning of the sentence.

"Guernsey Hereford cows that graze in a meadow" uses a restrictive relative clause. ie. it implies that the interpreter can distinguish between Guenseys and Hereford cows that graze in a meadow, but what about cows that do not graze in a meadow? There is also a difference in meaning as relates to time: the present participle "grazing" is implied to occur at the same time as the verb "distinguish", but "cows that graze" is a general statement that could apply to the cows even while they're not visible for surveillance purposes.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:50 am
Hi,
I will give an analogy which will make you understand better:
A. between Indian and American men
B. between Indians and Americans men
Clearly men in B is redundant when we have already used Indians and Americans, which will take care of this.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:10 am
Thanked: 13 times

by shekhar.kataria » Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:18 am
Thanks Everone. Point clear.
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by karanrulz4ever » Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:39 am
'That' modifies the word which it immediately succeeds...here 'that' will modify only Herefords cows and not Guernsey cows..Hence A is better

• Page 1 of 1