Inversion versus Passive Voice?

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
2009 Beat The GMAT Scholarship Winner
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:35 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:700+

Inversion versus Passive Voice?

by gkumar » Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:46 am
From OG12 D45

In 1923, the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage
for women and children in the District of Columbia as
unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of pricefixing
and, as such, an abridgment of the right of
contract.
(A) the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage
for women and children in the District of
Columbia as unconstitutional, and
(B) the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional
a minimum wage for women and children in the
District of Columbia, and
(C) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a
minimum wage for women and children in the
District of Columbia,
(D) a minimum wage for women and children in the
District of Columbia was declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,
(E) when the Supreme Court declared a minimum
wage for women and children in the District of
Columbia as unconstitutional,

[spoiler]I chose D over C, but C is correct. Although active voice is preferred for correct answer choices, passive voice could be correct if other choices don't make sense.

C apparently is correct because of the concept of "Inversion", which is used for long phrases. I thought C was incorrect because it was wordy and awkward, but that is not the case here.

* When is Inversion preferred over grammatically correct passive voice?
* Why is C preferred over D as the OA?
[/spoiler]

Please describe how you choose your answer.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:54 am
(C) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a
minimum wage for women and children in the
District of Columbia,

(D) a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia was declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,

I think its a modifier problem...

in 1923,Supreme court ...
Is preferred over

In 1923, a minimum wage....

Thus C...

User avatar
2009 Beat The GMAT Scholarship Winner
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:35 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:700+

by gkumar » Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:57 am
Hmm I'm trying to follow your logic.

", ruling that it was a form of pricefixing
and, as such, an abridgment of the right of
contract." is the phrase

Who is doing the ruling? The Supreme court is and not the minimum wage. So shouldn't "ruling..." be adjacent or close to "Supreme Court"?

C does not have this adjacency. D does however. So why is this adjacency not required?

Please clarify. Thanks!

User avatar
2009 Beat The GMAT Scholarship Winner
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:35 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:700+

by gkumar » Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:00 am
I think I see the problem now.

Supreme Court is the subject of the main clause in C
a minimum wage is the subject of the main clause in D

A gerund (-ing) phrase does not have to be adjacent to the word that it describes. But it should modify the proper subject of the main clause, which is the Supreme Court.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 2:55 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by minhchau1986 » Tue May 01, 2012 6:14 am
I chose D over C as well. Thanks guy. In this problem, I focus on "and" or no "and". Because ruling is the gerund phrase so "and" creates independent clause which is grammatically incorrect in this problem.
A and B are eliminated.
Down to C, D, and E
E: eliminated because second clause is not complete sentence when we are using "when"
Gkumar refers that gerund should modifier to the main clause in this sentence so we can eliminate D because "minimum wage" is modifier in this sentence, which makes no sense
Chose C

• Page 1 of 1