Unlike the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress, the government's argument centered on what many legal experts consider a main-stream interpretation of the Bill of Rights.
A) the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
B) the argument from the petitioner, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
C) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
D) the petitioner's argument, whose case rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
confused between C and D
OA after discussion
A) the team of lawyers working for the petitioner, whose argument rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
B) the argument from the petitioner, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
C) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that only recently passed Congress
D) the petitioner's argument, whose case rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
E) the petitioner's argument, which rested on a questionable interpretation of a bill that recently only passed Congress
confused between C and D
OA after discussion
