BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Prohibiting .... from

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 727
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:1 members

Prohibiting .... from

by umaa » Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:07 pm
In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purification method, the company required each employee to sign a confidentiality agreement prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies using an analogous purification process.

A. prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies
B. prohibiting them from the disclosing of its water purification methods to any company
C. prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company
D. that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies
E. that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company

[spoiler]OA is C. But I couldn't find what is wrong with A. Any finding?[/spoiler]
What we think, we become
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Sun Dec 27, 2009 3:56 pm
If prohibit can use the subjunctive form "that...be" - I would say A is correct, if not B, D are out because of singular / plural issue E is passive...so we are left with C.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:33 am
IN a IMO the meaning is not clear as the purpose of the agreement is to prohibit the disclousre of methods
but in A the wordings are awkard
Top
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pm
Thanked: 653 times
Followed by:252 members

by papgust » Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:01 am
In A, it is not clear who is prohibiting what from doing so and so. Moreover, "its" can refer to either company or employee.
And, the use of prohibit in A is unidiomatic.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:59 pm
If its can refer to company or employee, what is its referring to in C?
papgust wrote:In A, it is not clear who is prohibiting what from doing so and so. Moreover, "its" can refer to either company or employee.
And, the use of prohibit in A is unidiomatic.
Top
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pm
Thanked: 653 times
Followed by:252 members

by papgust » Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:24 pm
I shouldn't have mentioned that point as all choices are having that. Anyway, to me it is still a pronoun referent error. But other choices are awkward in some way or the other and the best choice is C which is having only that pronoun error. Pronoun errors could be taken as a secondary error. If you have more errors in other choices, then you could tolerate a choice which only has a pronoun error and keeps the intended meaning intact.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:36 pm
mehravikas wrote:If prohibit can use the subjunctive form "that...be" - I would say A is correct, if not B, D are out because of singular / plural issue E is passive...so we are left with C.

I agree with u!!
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:48 pm
I would still say the same thing if subjuctive forms can be used with prohibit then A stands correct.

Eagerly waiting for the OA.
papgust wrote:I shouldn't have mentioned that point as all choices are having that. Anyway, to me it is still a pronoun referent error. But other choices are awkward in some way or the other and the best choice is C which is having only that pronoun error. Pronoun errors could be taken as a secondary error. If you have more errors in other choices, then you could tolerate a choice which only has a pronoun error and keeps the intended meaning intact.
Top
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pm
Thanked: 653 times
Followed by:252 members

by papgust » Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:56 am
I guess umaa has already hid the answer
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:30 pm
On the GMAT, gender bearing nouns will always take a gender. The GMAT is not concerned with political correctness and you will never see someone with unidentified gender referred to as "them" or "it".


Accordingly, the only parent noun with which "its" could possibly agree is the company, so no problem on that account.

Idiomatically, we prohibit someone from doing something; we don't use the subjunctive for negative action verbs. "Prohibiting that" is non-idiomatic.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:36 pm
C also doesn't use the correct idiom..its missing "from"
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:On the GMAT, gender bearing nouns will always take a gender. The GMAT is not concerned with political correctness and you will never see someone with unidentified gender referred to as "them" or "it".


Accordingly, the only parent noun with which "its" could possibly agree is the company, so no problem on that account.

Idiomatically, we prohibit someone from doing something; we don't use the subjunctive for negative action verbs. "Prohibiting that" is non-idiomatic.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:09 pm
mehravikas wrote:C also doesn't use the correct idiom..its missing "from"
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:On the GMAT, gender bearing nouns will always take a gender. The GMAT is not concerned with political correctness and you will never see someone with unidentified gender referred to as "them" or "it".


Accordingly, the only parent noun with which "its" could possibly agree is the company, so no problem on that account.

Idiomatically, we prohibit someone from doing something; we don't use the subjunctive for negative action verbs. "Prohibiting that" is non-idiomatic.
C completely changes it, so we're not prohibiting someone from doing something, we're prohibiting disclosure to someone, which is also fine.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:12 pm
Great thanks.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1