BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Please explain

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:34 pm

by Buddy2011 » Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:26 am
I think Option E is right.

The premise of the argument says that hazardous waste was 90 per production worker before and now It has reduced to 40 per per-production worker.Option E says number of production workers for the same task has remained the same. So we can conclude the same

Nevertheless, Option A is strong contender.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 8:05 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by dodgeforgmat » Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:44 pm
In order for the conclusion to hold good, the amount of hazardous waste generated by the Passanger Jet, on the whole, should have reduced by atleast half of that in 1994. The premise shows that the amount of waste generated per production worker has reduced by half. Now if the number of production workers had been substantially more than that in 1994, the total amount of hazardous waste will still be more @ 40/production worker. So it is important to note that the conclusion will hold good only when the increase in number of production workers, if any, is not substantial. Hence Answer choice E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 25 times

by Ozlemg » Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:31 am
I agree with above comments.

As statement state "per worker" it assumes that the number of workers did not change significantly
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1