BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

support the claims above

Expert replies
by 4meonly » Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:53 am
When people predict that certain result will not take place unless a certain action is taken, they believe that they have learned that the prediction is correct when the action is taken and the result occurs. On reflection, however, it often becomes clear that the result admits of more than one interpretation.

Which of the following, if true, best supports the claims above?

(A) Judging the success of an action requires specifying the goal of the action.
(B) Judging which action to take after a prediction is made requires knowing about other actions that have been successful in similar past situations.
(C) Learning whether a certain predictive strategy is good requires knowing the result using that strategy through several trials.
(D) Distinguishing a correct prediction and effective action from an incorrect prediction and ineffective action is often impossible.
(E) Making a successful prediction requires knowing the facts about the context of that prediction.

OA D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by 4meonly » Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:55 am
Anybody?
Join the discussion

by logitech » Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:00 am
4meonly wrote:Anybody?
GOD! I have no idea. 4meonly, one suggestion..Unlike the quant problems, verbal problems are more beneficial to all of us when we dont know the OA. What do you think ? I am just curious to learn what others think.

For example:

In this question, I got lost and I looked the OA and now I stopped thinking about other options and trying to prove the OA..so I STOPPED!

:oops:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:12 am
4meonly wrote:Anybody?
atleast not me :shock:
Logitech is right!!
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by graem83d » Fri May 13, 2016 3:46 am
I THINK IT'S D
Join the discussion