BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Rule of three - Conceptual question

Expert replies
by metallicafan » Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:46 am
I know that I have to use the "rule of three" when the relationship between the variables is direct and proportional. Identifying that the relationship is direct is easy; however, I don't know how to be sure that that the relationship is proportional. Is there a method or tecnique to confirm that?

For example,
If 7 candies represent the 35% of a bag of candies, how many candies are in the bag?
Common sense tells me that I have to use the rule of three:

7 ----- 35
x ----- 100

x = 20

Although that's the correct answer I was not sure that the relationship is proportional. How to confirm that in this problem and in more complex questions?
Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Jim@StratusPrep » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:38 pm
you can just treat this like an equation and solve for x no matter how hard the math becomes.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:54 pm
To answer your question in a more conceptually abstract way... percents are always proportional information. If you're saying that 7 is 35% of something, you're really saying that the relationship of 7 to the total is the same as the relationship of 35 to 100. In other words, 7/x = 35/100. Or you could compare in the other direction - the relationship of 7 to 35 is the same as the relationship of the total to 100: 7/35 = x/100. Once you cross-multiply, you see that the math is identical.

Did this answer your question about how to figure out if something is a proportion?
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion