Tough RC question in Gmatclub test

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
Location: Vietnam
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:5 members

Tough RC question in Gmatclub test

by tuanquang269 » Fri Dec 02, 2011 5:07 am
The Chicago School of economics gained ascendancy in the 1950s and became the prevailing way of thinking about capitalist economics, first in the United States and eventually in many Western countries. A dominant subset of "Neoclassical economics," the Chicago School fine-tuned many of the fundamentals of the larger movement and articulated tenets now generally taken for granted in economic thought.

A basic principle of Neoclassical economics is the concept of utility, or the assertion that a correct economic decision is one that yields "the greatest good for the greatest number." Neoclassical economics vociferously defends a laissez-faire, or "hands off," approach to government regulation. According to Neoclassical theory, in the absence of state interference, individual participants in the market will make rational economic decisions that maximize their satisfaction. For individuals, the principle of utility translates into buying quality goods at the lowest possible price; for companies, it means making decisions that will maximize profits. The interplay of free market forces, according to Neoclassical economists, will result in greater good - in the form of high quality products and services - for a greater number of people.

The Chicago School accepts the principles of utility and laissez-faire regulation, but tailors its understanding of these terms to focus on the related principle of "efficiency." For Chicago School thinkers, "efficiency" subsumes Neoclassical thought on the mechanisms of utility, which concentrates on individuals making individual rational decisions, into a more sophisticated awareness of the balance between individual decisions and production. The chief cause of inefficiency for Chicago School thinkers is government regulation, which prevents the free interplay of market forces. In an economy unencumbered by state interference, not only are individuals and companies free to maximize their satisfaction, but production itself is likely to become more efficient by producing the highest quality goods at the lowest possible price.

The author of the passage most likely states that greater good comes in the form of high quality products and services for which of the following reasons?

1. To underscore the fact that Neoclassical economists are more concerned with the greater good than other types of economists.
2.To remind readers that, for the principle of utility to truly apply, goods and services must be put to appropriate use.
3. To emphasize the fact that products and services are good, but high quality products and services are better.
4. To distinguish between economic good (quality products and services) and economic evil (lack of quality products and services).
5. To make clear an implied distinction between moral good (virtue) and economic good (quality products and services).
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 8:05 pm
Thanked: 26 times
Followed by:4 members

by chieftang » Fri Dec 02, 2011 8:40 am
IMO:
[spoiler]5. To make clear an implied distinction between moral good (virtue) and economic good (quality products and services).[/spoiler]

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
Location: Vietnam
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:5 members

by tuanquang269 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:20 am
chieftang wrote:IMO:
[spoiler]5. To make clear an implied distinction between moral good (virtue) and economic good (quality products and services).[/spoiler]
How can you reasoning for this choice?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 8:05 pm
Thanked: 26 times
Followed by:4 members

by chieftang » Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:52 am
tuanquang269 wrote:
chieftang wrote:IMO:
[spoiler]5. To make clear an implied distinction between moral good (virtue) and economic good (quality products and services).[/spoiler]
How can you reasoning for this choice?
If you can tell me if I am correct, then I'll try to explain. The main problem I run in to with questions like this is the time it takes to read the passage. I'm at about 80 or 90 seconds after reading the passage, and still need to consider all the answer choices.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
Location: Vietnam
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:5 members

by tuanquang269 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:52 pm
chieftang wrote:
tuanquang269 wrote:
chieftang wrote:IMO:
[spoiler]5. To make clear an implied distinction between moral good (virtue) and economic good (quality products and services).[/spoiler]
How can you reasoning for this choice?
If you can tell me if I am correct, then I'll try to explain. The main problem I run in to with questions like this is the time it takes to read the passage. I'm at about 80 or 90 seconds after reading the passage, and still need to consider all the answer choices.
Yes, of course, you are correct. Please explain how you can quickly choose the right answer.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:07 am
Thanked: 19 times
Followed by:3 members

by GmatVerbal » Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:38 pm
This is a tough one. The purpose of the statement is better understood if we personalize the argument.

The first line of the second para says -

A basic principle of Neoclassical economics is the concept of utility, or the assertion that a correct economic decision is one that yields "the greatest good for the greatest number.

The last line (and also the question stem)
The interplay of free market forces, according to Neoclassical economists, will result in greater good - in the form of high quality products and services - for a greater number of people.

He is essentially saying Neoclassical economics is all about utility, The greater good. ( i.e. Not the good but the greater( the ultimate) good ). It really meant to say its not the good every body normally understands but the economic good i.e. the higher utility.

With that said -- lets eliminate choices

1.To underscore the fact that Neoclassical economists are more concerned with the greater good than other types of economists. -> In this paragraph he is really talking about the just about neoclassical economics ( and not about/comparing other economics).

2. Its all about utility and not about actual usage.

3. He is not talking about what is good or better; He is talking about what is the philosophy of neoclassical economics i.e. what is the main goal;

4. same as (3); not really talking about good/bad;

5. This is the closest. The author really meant- It is not the good everybody understands.. but the greater good. Just to differentiate the from the good( what ever it may be).