BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

work problems

Expert replies
by resilient » Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:51 am
Stacy and heather are 20 miles apart and walk towards each other along the same route. STacy walks at a constant rate that is 1 mile per hour faster than heathers constant rate of 5 mph. If heather starts her journey 24 minutes later after stacy, how far from her original desintation has heather walked when the two meet?

qa is 8

to do this: manhattan gmat explains that one must set up a double rate chart.


Stacy heather total

R 6mph 5 mph -----

T t +.4 hours t hours -----

D 20-d miles d miles 20 miles


Obviously Stacy gets time plus a variable because she has been traveling longer. But the distance I dont understand. Why is Stacy's distance 20-d and heathers distance d.

Can they be switched back and forth?
How to know which one gets what distance?

Side note: other than og are there any sources to go to to master this topic!
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

similiar question same concept

by resilient » Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:02 pm
Here is a similar question but same concept and question at hand.

one hour after andre started walking the 60 miles from x to y, james started walking from x to y as well. Andrew walks 3 mph and james walkes 1 mph faster than andre. How far from x will james be when he chatces up to andre?

to set up a variable chart in order to compute this. Manhattan gmat way!

andre james

d= (60-d)???? d= (d)????
r= 3mph r= 4mph
t= t=1 t= t


the success to these questions hinges on understanding how to chart these variables.. How do I know how to set up the distance variables. Is this right? Can they be interchanged?
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

Re: work problems

by xeqtr » Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:30 pm
Pretty straightforward Engin Karde$ :)

since distance = time x speed

Heather will start 24 mins later, which means when they meet stacy will be walking for a time of "t + 0.4" hours and heather for t hours.

same for the distance when they meet heather would have walked d miles whereas stacy would have 20 - d. however you can switch them back or forth but this way the calculation will be easier trust me ;) I use a similar technique to this but this is good as well..just seen that

Enginpasa1 wrote:Stacy and heather are 20 miles apart and walk towards each other along the same route. STacy walks at a constant rate that is 1 mile per hour faster than heathers constant rate of 5 mph. If heather starts her journey 24 minutes later after stacy, how far from her original desintation has heather walked when the two meet?

qa is 8

to do this: manhattan gmat explains that one must set up a double rate chart.


Stacy heather total

R 6mph 5 mph -----

T t +.4 hours t hours -----

D 20-d miles d miles 20 miles


Obviously Stacy gets time plus a variable because she has been traveling longer. But the distance I dont understand. Why is Stacy's distance 20-d and heathers distance d.

Can they be switched back and forth?
How to know which one gets what distance?

Side note: other than og are there any sources to go to to master this topic!
Join the discussion

3rd question same cancept

by resilient » Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:31 pm
a bullet train leaves kyoto for tokyo travelling 240 mph at noon. Ten minutes later, a train leaves tokyo for kyoto traveling 160 mph. If tokyo and kyoto are 300 miles apart, at what time will the trains pass eachother?

a. 12:40
b. 12:49
c. 12:55
d. 1:00
e. 1:05


qa is b


The accompanying variable chart for this is:

K to T T to K Total

R 240 mph 160 mph -------

T t + 1/6 hrs t hrs -------

D 300-d miles d miles 300



My question is how to set up the bold REd? Are they interchangable? What is the rationale of setting this up?
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by xeqtr » Sat Mar 15, 2008 3:39 pm
yes it is interchangable, since depending on how you state, d will change and will have 2 different values.
Join the discussion

sometimes

by resilient » Sat Mar 15, 2008 3:51 pm
most of the time the setup doesnt even matter and the actual computations will matter. But it is still good to know and have in your pocket.
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

Re: sometimes

by xeqtr » Sat Mar 15, 2008 3:54 pm
IMO it comes with experience to state it so. Since 160 x t = d is the simplest form..if you state it otherwise such that:

240 x (t + 1/6) = d, 160 x t = 300 - d..it's lil bit more complicated to substitute d to use in the other equation. That's why the author did it so I think..

K to T T to K Total

R 240 mph 160 mph -------

T t + 1/6 hrs t hrs -------

D 300-d miles d miles 300
Enginpasa1 wrote:most of the time the setup doesnt even matter and the actual computations will matter. But it is still good to know and have in your pocket.
Join the discussion