Invt Banks

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:58 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

Invt Banks

by zagcollins » Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:06 am
Investment banks often have conflicting roles. They sometimes act for a client company by raising capital from other investment institutions as advantageously as possible, but their analysts also sometimes send unfavorable reports on the financial health of companies for whom they are raising capital to other clients who wish to make investments. Analysis of companies’ financial health need to be unbiased if an investment bank is to achieve long-term success.

If the statements above are true, which of the following practices, if adopted by an investment bank, would hinder its long-term success?

A. Evaluating and rewarding the bank’s analysts on the basis of recommendations made by managers who are solely engaged in raising capital for clients
B. Using reports by the investment bank’s analysts to determine how best to raise capital for a client
C. Sharing the task of raising capital for a client with other investment banks
D. Ensuring that conflicts between analysts and those who raise capital for clients are carefully mediated and resolved by impartial arbitrators
E. Monitoring the success or failure of analysts’ current predictions about how companies will perform financially, in order to determine the value of future predictions


OA is A.
Last edited by zagcollins on Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:00 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by ildude02 » Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:19 am
the argument concludes that the long term success is dependent on "unbiased" analysis. So if any choice that has anything to do with "biased" analysis will be the answer. Choice A fits into that category with "recommendations" of the managers.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:54 am
ildude02 wrote:the argument concludes that the long term success is dependent on "unbiased" analysis. So if any choice that has anything to do with "biased" analysis will be the answer. Choice A fits into that category with "recommendations" of the managers.
Any taker for this one I am confused.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:08 am
maihuna wrote:
ildude02 wrote:the argument concludes that the long term success is dependent on "unbiased" analysis. So if any choice that has anything to do with "biased" analysis will be the answer. Choice A fits into that category with "recommendations" of the managers.
Any taker for this one I am confused.
IMO A does it's job pretty well.

If u keenly observe option B seems to be a boobytrap!!
In the argument it is clearly mentioned that only "sometimes" the analyst shall send unfavorable reports on the financial health of companies for whom they are raising capital to other clients who wish to make investments.

Going by this we cant conclude or opt B.that would be something like generalising the whole idea about reports!

Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

by akhpad » Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:07 am
gmatmachoman [Govardhan ],

Ron said B is the answer but all the places people have posted OA: A. No idea, what is the source. I am still confused over A and B.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/inv ... 10031.html

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by Prashant Ranjan » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:21 am
Following is my perspective:
I would go with option (B) as the answer choice - what Ron has said.
The best way to judge the argument would be to personalize it and imagine ourselves to be in the Investment bank.
(A) This is something that will be true - but I don't see it a reason that will hinder the long term success of the Investment Bank. On the contrary, it seems to foster a good reputation of the Investment Bank in the eyes of entrepreneurs who want to raise money for their ventures.
The Bank analysts' are the ones who are responsible for sending the misleading reports to other clients. The Managers are the ones who are responsible of arranging capital for clients. In the argument, it's stated that IB raise the money as advantageously as possible, however the analysts discourage those who wish to make investments in the new venture. The Most probable Interpretation of this scenario, is that the analysts want to build the reputation of the IB as the sole money raiser for the venture, which might go with building its reputation in the market. So choice (A) is the obvious result of such practice followed and would not hinder the long term progress of the IB.

Choice (B): Imagine I am a third person (not an analyst) and want to use the reports (dubious though) of the IB's analysts to raise money for a client. I will not be successful in this attempt, as the reports themselves are misleading. So (B) makes a perfect sense here.

(C): Note the question stem here. It says that if the "above statements are true". It doesn't say anything like "if the following statements are true". So I think I should be wary of making any unjust assumptions (apart from the Most real world/obvious ones) in the answer choices. We don't know whether an IB1 interaction with IB2, would be superficial (like with any other client) or they would share the analysis behind the reports. So (C) is ruled out, in comparison to (B).

Thanks
Prashant