PS from PR

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:19 pm
Location: Bangladesh
Thanked: 1 times

PS from PR

by rabab » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:08 am
The output of a factory was raised by 10% to keep up with rising demand. To handle the holiday rush, this new output was increased by 20%. By approximately what percent would the output now have to be decreased in order to restore the original output?

a. 20%
b. 24%
c. 30%
d. 32%
e. 79%

IOM 32%.
Source: — Problem Solving |

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:36 am

by toudavis » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:13 am
Agreed.

Start with 100(1.10) = 110
110(1.20) = 132

(Orig - New)/New = (100-132)/100 = 32/100 or 32%

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:19 pm
Location: Bangladesh
Thanked: 1 times

by rabab » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:19 am
But PR says the answer should be 24%. I don't get it.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

by mental » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:26 am
IMO B

rabab and toudavis

going with ur values
Start with 100(1.10) = 110
110(1.20) = 132

current level is 132, old level 100

to bring 132 to 100 we have to reduce by 32

so 32 is how much percent of 132:
32/132 is approx 24%

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:19 pm
Location: Bangladesh
Thanked: 1 times

by rabab » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:32 am
mental wrote:IMO B

rabab and toudavis

going with ur values
Start with 100(1.10) = 110
110(1.20) = 132

current level is 132, old level 100

to bring 132 to 100 we have to reduce by 32

so 32 is how much percent of 132:
32/132 is approx 24%
I see. Thanks for the help! :)

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1223
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 3:29 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 185 times
Followed by:15 members

by VP_Jim » Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:31 pm
Nothing to add here really - the explanation above (from mental) is fine. Start with 100 and then figure it out from there.

I did want to say, though, that this is a classic GMAT trap: tricking people into saying that the percent decrease from x to y would be the same as the percent increase from y to x (in this case, the percent decrease from 132 to 100 is not the same as the percent incresae from 100 to 132).

Be careful!
Jim S. | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep

Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:48 am
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 28 times

by vishubn » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:13 pm
Thanks mental for the explanation and Rahab for posting the question !
tricky one
:)

Vishu

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:48 pm
imo:B