Probability

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:54 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:660

Probability

by crazy4gmat » Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:03 am
Six mobsters have arrived at the theater for the premiere of the film “Goodbuddies.” One of the mobsters, Frankie, is an informer, and he's afraid that another member of his crew, Joey, is on to him. Frankie, wanting to keep Joey in his sights, insists upon standing behind Joey in line at the concession stand, though not necessarily right behind him. How many ways can the six arrange themselves in line such that Frankie’s requirement is satisfied?
a)6
b)24
c)120
d)360
e)720
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Thanked: 113 times
Followed by:27 members
GMAT Score:710

by dmateer25 » Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:47 am
Here are the possibilities:

FJ----
F-J---
F--J--
F---J-
F----J
-FJ---
-F-J--
-F--J-
-F---J
--FJ--
--F-J-
--F--J
---FJ-
---F-J
----FJ

So there are 15 ways that Joey can be behind Frankie.

Now the other 4 mobsters can be sorted in any of the spots for each of the 15 possibilities:

4! = 24

15 * 24 = 360

IMO D

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: Probability

by logitech » Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:39 am
crazy4gmat wrote:Six mobsters have arrived at the theater for the premiere of the film “Goodbuddies.” One of the mobsters, Frankie, is an informer, and he's afraid that another member of his crew, Joey, is on to him. Frankie, wanting to keep Joey in his sights, insists upon standing behind Joey in line at the concession stand, though not necessarily right behind him. How many ways can the six arrange themselves in line such that Frankie’s requirement is satisfied?
a)6
b)24
c)120
d)360
e)720
6 people can sit in row:

6! = 720 different ways

50 % of these ways Frankie will be in behind Joey

720/2 = 360

if you get confused about this approach you can test it with simple sets like 2 person A and B

A B
B A

there are 2 ways and 1 time A is behind B and 1 time B is behing A ( 50 % )
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:43 am
Ignoring Frankie's requirement for a moment, observe that the six mobsters can be arranged 6! or 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 720 different ways in the concession stand line. In each of those 720 arrangements, Frankie must be either ahead of or behind Joey. Logically, since the combinations favor neither Frankie nor Joey, each would be behind the other in precisely half of the arrangements. Therefore, in order to satisfy Frankie's requirement, the six mobsters could be arranged in 720/2 = 360 different ways.

Source MGMAT

Go with D.
Last edited by sanju09 on Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:35 am
sanju09 wrote:Ignoring Frankie's requirement for a moment, observe that the six mobsters can be arranged 6! or 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 720 different ways in the concession stand line. In each of those 720 arrangements, Frankie must be either ahead of or behind Joey. Logically, since the combinations favor neither Frankie nor Joey, each would be behind the other in precisely half of the arrangements. Therefore, in order to satisfy Frankie's requirement, the six mobsters could be arranged in 720/2 = 360 different ways.
Sanju, that is word-for-word the explanation provided by MGMAT. It was reprinted in this thread, for example:

www.beatthegmat.com/manhattan-gmat-comb ... t9284.html

Since you have not cited the source of the explanation, you've made it appear that it is your own work and wording. This is normally considered plagiarism. If you are going to quote from a published source, you should credit that source.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:56 pm
Oh yes Ian! Thanks for telling me the source, which I never knew. Actually one of my student at New Jersy sent me a bunch of questions, few with answers and few with explanations, and demanded my own explanations on the same questions, a month ago. This question was among those with the same explanation, and I liked it better than my own. I can redirect the same mail to you for verification if you want to see it, and you will find that there is no source mentioned in the mail. Now, since I know it by you, I am going to attribute it to MGMAT.

Thanks...
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com