BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

N^2 + 1

Expert replies
by skalevar » Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:33 pm
Hi,

This is from Veritas Advanced Word Problems and Quantitative Review.

Which of the following describes all values for which n^2-1 >= 0?

A. N>=1
B. N<=-1
C. 0<=n<=1
D. N<=-1 or N>=1
E. -1<=n<=1

I got the answer right by deduction, but the straight algebra doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone explain what I am doing wrong?

My algebra went like this:
n^2 - 1 >=0
(n-1)(n+1) >=0
n-1 >=0 or n+1 >=0
n>=1 or n>=-1

However, the second condition is clearly not right (n cannot be 0 for instance). I am not multiplying or dividing this inequality by a negative a number, so there should be no reason to switch the sign for the inequality. What is the proper way to do the algebra?

Answer is D.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by limestone » Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:46 pm
n^2 -1 >=0 means
n^2 >=1 or
Abs(n) >=1, then n<=-1 or n>=1
Pick D
My algebra went like this:
n^2 - 1 >=0
(n-1)(n+1) >=0
n-1 >=0 or n+1 >=0
n>=1 or n>=-1
There're two cases here:
1. n-1>=0 and n+1>=0(not or because both n+1 and n-1 need to be positive to have their product a positive, if n+1 is positive and n-1 is negative (in case n = 0.5), then the condition will not be met)
=> n>=1 and n>=-1 => n>=1 ( as when n>=1, n is obviously larger than -1)
2.
n-1<=0 and n+1<=0 (and because of the same reason in case 1)
=> n<=1 and n<=-1 => n<=-1 (as when n<=-1, n is obviously smaller than 1)
Combine the two cases n>=1 or n<=-1
"There is nothing either good or bad - but thinking makes it so" - Shakespeare.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:01 pm
skalevar wrote:Hi,

This is from Veritas Advanced Word Problems and Quantitative Review.

Which of the following describes all values for which n^2-1 >= 0?

A. N>=1
B. N<=-1
C. 0<=n<=1
D. N<=-1 or N>=1
E. -1<=n<=1

I got the answer right by deduction, but the straight algebra doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone explain what I am doing wrong?

My algebra went like this:
n^2 - 1 >=0
(n-1)(n+1) >=0
n-1 >=0 or n+1 >=0
n>=1 or n>=-1

However, the second condition is clearly not right (n cannot be 0 for instance). I am not multiplying or dividing this inequality by a negative a number, so there should be no reason to switch the sign for the inequality. What is the proper way to do the algebra?

Answer is D.
The issues are that individually, (n-1) and (n+1) can be both negative (say n= -3) or both positive and still have their product >=0. Because they can both be negative, you can't logically go to your 3rd step "or".

Also what limestone said.
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:12 pm
Your solution till second step is correct which is (n-1)(n+1)>= 0.

This means case (1) both (n-1) >= 0 and (n+1)>= 0.
Or case (2) both (n-1) < = 0 and (n+1) < = 0.

Take case (1).
It means n >= 1 and n >= -1.
Note the word and here. Both the conditions n >= 1 and n >= -1 have to be satisfied. This is only possible if n > = 1. For example you cannot take n = -1/2. Though -1/2 >= -1, it is not >= 1.
What you did was n >= 1 or n >= -1 which is not correct.
Hence case (1) gives us that n>=1.

Take case (2).
It means n <= 1 and n < = -1.
Do the same thing. On combining we have that n <= -1. For example you cannot take n = ½.
Though ½ <= 1, it is not <= -1.
Hence case (2) gives us that n <= -1.

So we can say that n^2 - 1 >= 0 implies n >= 1 or n <= -1.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by skalevar » Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:14 am
Thanks all. that makes a lot more sense!
Join the discussion