BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

(OG-12 DS) Joanna...

Expert replies
by Elena89 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:31 am
Joanna bought only $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?

(1) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps.

(2) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.


OG has a weird explanation for this one. Can someone give a simpler one? Thanks..
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by rijul007 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:00 am
No of $0.15 stamps=x
No of $0.29 stamps=y
(1) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps.
0.15x + 0.29y = 4.4

Not Sufficient
(2) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.
x = y

still not sufficient


Combining the two statements

0.15x + 0.29x = 4.4

Find the value of x


Option C
Join the discussion

by Elena89 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:35 am
@rijul007

yeah, that's what I did, however that's incorrect!
The correct answer is A
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:05 am
opss in st(2) there's a small nuance

though found in OG-12 it comes from old OGs till now

the question to find integer value of quantity for $0.15 priced stamps bought.
let $0.15 priced stamps' quantity be A and $0.29 priced ones' be B, then 0.15A+0.29B=Cost of stamps
and we need to find A?
st(1) implies Cost Joanna paid was 4.40 and we assume buying B number of $0.29 priced stamps - we must find the possible integer value of B, if any. For this we assign two binomials 0.29B+0.15A=4.40 and assess the values of A and B. If we succeed to find the unique values for A and B, then st(1) is Sufficient, otherwise Not.
start with B as prime
B=1 -> 29+15A=440 AND A=(440-29)/15 Not Integer(NI)
B=2 -> 58+15A=440 AND A=(440-58)/15 NI
...
we can use common sense as a number is divisible by 5 if it ends by 0 or 5, and (440-29B) will end in 5 or 0 only if B=5,10,15
B=5, 145+15A=440, A=295/15 NI
B=10, 290+15A=440, A=150/15 good choice
B=15, 435+15A=440, A=5/15 NI

hence we have one unique set when A=10 and B=10 and can answer the question, Sufficient.
check: 0.29*10+0.15*10=4.40

st(2) A=B and we need to know the Cost which is in st(1) only (15A+29B=440 OR 44A=440, A=10) therefore st(2) Alone is Not Sufficient

answer A
Last edited by pemdas on Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:11 am, edited 2 times in total.
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by rijul007 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:09 am
Elena89 wrote:@rijul007

yeah, that's what I did, however that's incorrect!
The correct answer is A
ok so its not as easy as it seemed


Statement 1

0.15x + 0.29y = 4.4
or
15x + 29y = 440

Y = 1
15x = 440-29 (not divisible by 15)

y = 5
15x = 440 - 145 (ot divisible by 15)

y = 10

15x = 450 - 290 = 150
x = 10

y = 15 = 145 + 290 = 435

15x = 440 - 29*15 = 440-435
[not divisible by 15]

so no of $0.15 stamps = 10

Sufficient

Option A
:D
Join the discussion

by Elena89 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:15 am
@pemdas

Wrong! The OA is 'A'

What I do not understand is how we can find the value of one unknown from only one equation. What I do understand from OG's explanation is that since both unknowns are 'integers'(whole numbers) therefore from the properties of integer constraints, only one value of any of the 2 unknowns is obtainable! and so the first is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:16 am
this q. shows how stupid mistakes may turn our GMAT lives into nightmares, I've mistakenly assumed that the Cost is given following st(1) Sufficient and turned D firstly. Afterwards, seen no word speaks about 4.40 Cost in st(2). Phew :twisted:
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:18 am
yea, just turned back and seen/corrected/explained in previous post
Elena89 wrote:@pemdas

Wrong! The OA is 'A'

What I do not understand is how we can find the value of one unknown from only one equation. What I do understand from OG's explanation is that since both unknowns are 'integers'(whole numbers) therefore from the properties of integer constraints, only one value of any of the 2 unknowns is obtainable! and so the first is sufficient.
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by Elena89 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:24 am
yeah, well all that is written in OG too.. but I don't think all that calculation can be done in just 2 minutes.. :?
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:37 am
listen, to calculate you need preset values, correct? The complexity and timeliness of your calculation depends on your values. If you start as I and riju from the detail consideration and move onto testing numbers, then yes it's over 2 mins?

However, if you use your number property theory knowledge and apply divisibility by 5 for (440-29B)/15 as I put in my solution, then it's only scratch paper work you do - max. four operations to test st(1) and st(2) is automatically Not Sufficient, unless you as I stupidly follow auto-pilot approach and decide the Cost is given.
Elena89 wrote:yeah, well all that is written in OG too.. but I don't think all that calculation can be done in just 2 minutes.. :?
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by Elena89 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:52 am
yeah, I get that.. thanks =)
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:47 am
Elena89 wrote:
What I do not understand is how we can find the value of one unknown from only one equation.
15x+29y=44

please pay attention to the fact, that x and y must be integers. since the result is too small (44), u should think first about 0, then about 1. so only if x=1 and y=1 we will get 44

stmnt2 is insuf. no info about the sum. all we know that x=y . so (2) is insuf
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:12 am
LalaB wrote:
Elena89 wrote:
What I do not understand is how we can find the value of one unknown from only one equation.
15x+29y=44

please pay attention to the fact, that x and y must be integers. since the result is too small (44), u should think first about 0, then about 1. so only if x=1 and y=1 we will get 44

stmnt2 is insuf. no info about the sum. all we know that x=y . so (2) is insuf
This is a common trap on the GMAT.

In high school, we learned that we cannot find the value of a variable if we're given 1 equation with 2 variables. However, if we restrict the variables to positive integers, then there are times when we can find the value of a variable if we're given 1 equation with 2 variables.

In this question, the number of each stamp denomination must be a positive integer.

I cover this common GMAT trap (and other common GMAT traps) in video #11 "Avoiding Common Mistakes - Part II." This is a free video you can find at: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-data-sufficiency

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion