BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is vs. Are

Expert replies
by Ravish » Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:06 pm
While I have been fairly confident about my ability to differentiate between the two terms, recently I have been seeing a few native speakers using the term is in sentences where I would usually use are:

Case in point:

Jordan is a great player but so IS Bryant, James and Nash.


My concern was regarding the IS before Bryant, James and Nash. I would think that , since they are 3 different people, we would be using the word ARE. Is this correct? If so , is it because they are 3 like entities which is why the use of the word IS is correct just as we can say Research and Development IS currently underway, the word IS in this case being correct since R&D can be considered 1 entity. Wasn't sure if it applies to people as well.

Help would be much appreciated.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:41 pm
Ravish wrote:While I have been fairly confident about my ability to differentiate between the two terms, recently I have been seeing a few native speakers using the term is in sentences where I would usually use are:

Case in point:

Jordan is a great player but so IS Bryant, James and Nash.


My concern was regarding the IS before Bryant, James and Nash. I would think that , since they are 3 different people, we would be using the word ARE. Is this correct? If so , is it because they are 3 like entities which is why the use of the word IS is correct just as we can say Research and Development IS currently underway, the word IS in this case being correct since R&D can be considered 1 entity. Wasn't sure if it applies to people as well.

Help would be much appreciated.
I think this is one of those cases where the speaker changed the sentence partway through. This happens in all languages. I can't think of an acceptable case of multiple people in a list being considered a single entity.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1