Tough SC
-
schumi_gmat
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:2 members
-
NSNguyen
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
I never seen dated to be
)
Please share your idea and your reasoning 
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Stacey Koprince
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- Thanked: 639 times
- Followed by:694 members
- GMAT Score:780
Thanks for typing out the question, parallel_chase!
Rock samples
------<taken from R of an A>
--------------------------<about twice the size of (another) A>
--------------------------------------------------------------<that eradicated D>
has (have!) been dated... etc.
Hopefully that formatting is clear - the stuff in brackets modifies the noun above where each <> starts. So, first, we have that subject-verb agreement issue. Eliminate A and B.
Next, we have "have been dated... (to be) (as being) or (at)"
The idiom is "dated at." No great explanation - there never is for an idiom. It just is what it is and we're supposed to memorize it.
It might help you remember to think of it this way:
Someone dated something AT a certain date - right now, they know (or claim) that it is this certain date.
If someone dated something TO BE a certain date, it could be interpreted as: what it will be in the future - it's going to be that date.
Or, you can just memorize it.
Eliminate C and D. That leaves E.
(And good catch to those who pointed out that D is missing the verb "are" - it's easy to miss little things like that. We can eliminate B for that same reason, and we can also eliminate A for a bad subj-verb match (is).
Rock samples
------<taken from R of an A>
--------------------------<about twice the size of (another) A>
--------------------------------------------------------------<that eradicated D>
has (have!) been dated... etc.
Hopefully that formatting is clear - the stuff in brackets modifies the noun above where each <> starts. So, first, we have that subject-verb agreement issue. Eliminate A and B.
Next, we have "have been dated... (to be) (as being) or (at)"
The idiom is "dated at." No great explanation - there never is for an idiom. It just is what it is and we're supposed to memorize it.
It might help you remember to think of it this way:
Someone dated something AT a certain date - right now, they know (or claim) that it is this certain date.
If someone dated something TO BE a certain date, it could be interpreted as: what it will be in the future - it's going to be that date.
Or, you can just memorize it.
Eliminate C and D. That leaves E.
(And good catch to those who pointed out that D is missing the verb "are" - it's easy to miss little things like that. We can eliminate B for that same reason, and we can also eliminate A for a bad subj-verb match (is).
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me












