BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

election

Expert replies
by Ozlemg » Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:34 am
In an election how many votes are cast.
1. the winning candidate gets 54% of the total votes
2. the winning candidate wins by 800

Why is not it to solve as I did below:

Winning Can. : x+100
Rest of the Candidates : x

(x+100) / x = 54% ...??

[spoiler]OA : E[/spoiler]
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:48 am
Ought to be (C) I think

Let total number of votes cast = x

(1) Winning candidate (w) got 0.54x votes (w = 0.54x), not enough to find x

(2) x = Winning candidate votes (w) + losing candidate votes (l)
w - l = 800
w + l = x
2w = 800 + x
Not enough to find x

Combine (1) and (2), we are able to deduce x
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:11 am
Hi,
I am not sure what exactly we need to consider.
Winning candidate gets 54% of the total votes -> total votes = total votes cast or just the number of eligible voters?
If we assume 54% of the votes cast, are there only 2 candidates in the contest? I don't know if we can make any assumptions.
Can you post the source of this question.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by kmittal82 » Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:17 am
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
I am not sure what exactly we need to consider.
Winning candidate gets 54% of the total votes -> total votes = total votes cast or just the number of eligible voters?
If we assume 54% of the votes cast, are there only 2 candidates in the contest? I don't know if we can make any assumptions.
Can you post the source of this question.
Interesting, the question indeed doesn't say how many candidates were there in this election. Having said that, I think it should be "safe" to assume that every vote cast is eligible.
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:24 am
kmittal82 wrote: Interesting, the question indeed doesn't say how many candidates were there in this election. Having said that, I think it should be "safe" to assume that every vote cast is eligible.
Hi,
I didn't mean some of the votes were ineligible. What I meant was different:
If there are 100K voters and only 70K voters voted, does total votes(statement 1) mean 100K or 70K. But, I guess we may assume it to be 70K.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:24 am
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
I am not sure what exactly we need to consider.
Winning candidate gets 54% of the total votes -> total votes = total votes cast or just the number of eligible voters?
If we assume 54% of the votes cast, are there only 2 candidates in the contest? I don't know if we can make any assumptions.
Can you post the source of this question.
GMAT Official Questions
Last edited by Ozlemg on Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by gmatboost » Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:41 am
I agree with Frankenstein, this question is very poorly worded and leaves ambiguity that the GMAT would never leave. I would be careful about using questions from this source.
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
Join the discussion