Tough CR

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:06 pm

Tough CR

by hemant.dunga » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:06 am
Essayist: Only happiness is intrinsically valuable; other things are valuable only insofar as they contribute to happiness. Some philosophers argue that the fact that we do not approve of a bad person’s being happy shows that we value happiness only when it is deserved. This supposedly shows that we find something besides happiness to be intrinsically valuable. But the happiness people deserve is determined by the amount of happiness they bring to others. Therefore, ______

Which one of the following most logically completes the final sentence of the essayist’s argument?

(A) the notion that people can be deserving of happiness is ultimately incoherent

(B) people do not actually value happiness as much as they think they do

(C) the judgment that a person deserves to be happy is itself to be understood in terms of happiness

(D) the only way to be assured of happiness is to bring happiness to those who have done something to deserve it

(E) a truly bad person cannot actually be very happy
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:01 am

by urs_maverick » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:25 am
IMO C :-

Conclusion should be something like one who deserves to be happy is intrinsic or internal in mind and not valuated by others

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:26 am
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:660

by Sher1 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:39 am

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:22 pm

by Estone29 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:00 pm
IMO - C

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:09 pm
C..

Only C seems to be relevant....
other choices are either too extreme or are redundant...

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:06 pm

by hemant.dunga » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:25 pm
Explanation plz

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:32 pm
IMO the answer should be C. Here's why:

[spoiler]A - doesn't really make sense... also a bit extreme
B - out of scope
D - doesn't mention how to become happy
E - we don't approve of the bad person being happy, but this doesn't mean that he can't be happy himself.[/spoiler]
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:54 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by ssmiles08 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:24 pm
IMO C too...
You got a dream... You gotta protect it. People can't do somethin' themselves, they wanna tell you you can't do it. If you want somethin', go get it. Period.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:28 pm
Thanked: 4 times

Fill in the blanks

by arorag » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:18 pm
sorry i had new post

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:22 am
Thanked: 19 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:700

by capnx » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:54 pm
go with C too. D is 2nd choice, but too strong :)

Legendary Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: Tokyo
Thanked: 81 times
GMAT Score:680

by tohellandback » Tue Aug 18, 2009 8:00 pm
IMO C
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:41 am
Thanked: 1 times

by acenikk » Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:45 am
I also go with C.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

Re: Tough CR

by gmatmachoman » Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:56 am
hemant.dunga wrote:Essayist: Only happiness is intrinsically valuable; other things are valuable only insofar as they contribute to happiness. Some philosophers argue that the fact that we do not approve of a bad person�s being happy shows that we value happiness only when it is deserved. This supposedly shows that we find something besides happiness to be intrinsically valuable. But the happiness people deserve is determined by the amount of happiness they bring to others. Therefore, ______

Which one of the following most logically completes the final sentence of the essayist�s argument?

(A) the notion that people can be deserving of happiness is ultimately incoherent

(B) people do not actually value happiness as much as they think they do

(C) the judgment that a person deserves to be happy is itself to be understood in terms of happiness

(D) the only way to be assured of happiness is to bring happiness to those who have done something to deserve it

(E) a truly bad person cannot actually be very happy
The term "amount of happiness " is a relative term.So it calls for a "parameter" that could define that.Here that parameter holds to be Happiness itself.So in my opinion C holds true which clearly tells only Happiness can be used to value "Happiness".

Post the OA plzz.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:03 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by pre-gmat » Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:08 pm
C should be the answer.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:20 am

by Eric77Gorm » Mon May 16, 2016 12:10 am
Looking at it now, C makes sense