On page 118,
" E or F " is the set of outcomes in E or F or both.
" E and F " is the set of outcomes in both E and F.
But P(E or F) = P(E) + P(F) - P(E and F).
I know by additional rule that this is case,
shouldn't "E or F" state " is the set of outcomes in E or F and not both "?
" E or F " is the set of outcomes in E or F or both.
" E and F " is the set of outcomes in both E and F.
But P(E or F) = P(E) + P(F) - P(E and F).
I know by additional rule that this is case,
shouldn't "E or F" state " is the set of outcomes in E or F and not both "?

















