BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Stupid question, simplification of an expression

Expert replies
by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:45 pm
oxfordbound wrote:Hi all,

first post, but really stupid question I can't wrap my head around. The problem below, I understand the entire logic of it, but don't understand why it was solved THIS way.

Question: Rectangluar floors X and Y are equal in area. If floor X is 12 feet by 18 feet and floor Y is 9 feet wide, what is the length of floor Y in feet?

I have seen the solution as:
(assuming l represents length of floor Y)

area of X = 12 * 18
area of Y = 9 * l

Therefore, 12 * 18 = 9l

--Here's where I get confused, normally I would just multiply the 12 by 18 and look for a divisble number by 9. But in a video i saw of this problem, the individual says "lets just take 9 out from both sides" and divides the 18 by the 9 but not the 12....why?????

In my mind, he would have to do 12/9 * 18/9.

(The answer is 24; he got this by multiplying 12 by 2. I would've gotten it by 162/9).

Clarifications please!

Oxforrd Bound
Area of X is 12*18 = 216.
Area of Y is 9*l where l is the length.
Or 9*l = 216.
Or l = 216/9 = 24.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:14 pm
oxfordbound wrote:
Therefore, 12 * 18 = 9l

--Here's where I get confused, normally I would just multiply the 12 by 18 and look for a divisble number by 9. But in a video i saw of this problem, the individual says "lets just take 9 out from both sides" and divides the 18 by the 9 but not the 12....why?????
We should always look for opportunities to change larger values into smaller values.

Given 12*18 = 9L, rather than multiply 12*18 -- which will result in a large product -- we should divide each side of the equation by 9 so that the numbers become smaller:

12*18/9 = 9L/9.
12*2 = L
24 = L.

Much easier and quicker than if were to multiply 12*18 first and then divide by 9.

Hope this helps!
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:22 am
oxfordbound wrote:Hi all,

first post, but really stupid question I can't wrap my head around. The problem below, I understand the entire logic of it, but don't understand why it was solved THIS way.

Question: Rectangluar floors X and Y are equal in area. If floor X is 12 feet by 18 feet and floor Y is 9 feet wide, what is the length of floor Y in feet?

I have seen the solution as:
(assuming l represents length of floor Y)

area of X = 12 * 18
area of Y = 9 * l

Therefore, 12 * 18 = 9l

--Here's where I get confused, normally I would just multiply the 12 by 18 and look for a divisble number by 9. But in a video i saw of this problem, the individual says "lets just take 9 out from both sides" and divides the 18 by the 9 but not the 12....why?????

In my mind, he would have to do 12/9 * 18/9.

(The answer is 24; he got this by multiplying 12 by 2. I would've gotten it by 162/9).

Clarifications please!

Oxforrd Bound
No one has expected hence no one really took notice what your actual doubt was. You meant that if 12*18 is divided by 9, then each component of the product should have been divided by 9, so that 12*18 is divided by 9 = (12/9)*(18/9), which is a wrong perception I am sorry. When an expression like x + y - z is divided by say m, it can be written like x/m + y/m - z/m since the expression is a polynomial whose each term needs to be divided by m in order to divide x + y - z by m; but if the expression is like x y z to be divided by say n, we take x y z as a single term because x y z is a monomial with x y z as its valid factors, and in working (x y z)/n out, we do common factor cancellation in order to reduce the fraction to its lowest where the solution becomes easier to get.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion