-
fangtray
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:50 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:3 members
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.
a.
b. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in.
c, d, and e were ridiculous.
as far as I can see, with A, the result from is an incorrect idiom. is there anything else wrong with A other than the "result from" idiom?
GMAT claims it is ambiguous what "possibly a result.." modifies. creatures of a seabed, or dwindling food supplies, but how does B correct it? and why is A ambiguous? seems to me as it is modifying food supplies pretty clearly.
a.
b. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in.
c, d, and e were ridiculous.
as far as I can see, with A, the result from is an incorrect idiom. is there anything else wrong with A other than the "result from" idiom?
GMAT claims it is ambiguous what "possibly a result.." modifies. creatures of a seabed, or dwindling food supplies, but how does B correct it? and why is A ambiguous? seems to me as it is modifying food supplies pretty clearly.
