BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

OG 13 ques

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:26 pm
Followed by:1 members

OG 13 ques

by anksm22 » Wed Oct 15, 2014 5:37 pm
That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it
is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention
microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.
(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault
(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault
(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology
(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology
(E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said





Ans D
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:53 am
anksm22 wrote:That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault
(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault
(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology
(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology
(E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said
A: it is their fault
C: it is the fault of educators
In these options, it lacks a clear referent.
Eliminate A and C.

B: That educators have not anticipated the impact...can hardly be said to be at fault
At fault for WHAT?
Since the intended meaning is unclear, eliminate B.

E: The fact...can hardly be said
Not the intended meaning.
THE FACT can certainly be SAID.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.

OA: It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.
Here, it is an EXPLETIVE: a placeholder pronoun serving to DELAY THE SUBJECT.
In most cases, the delayed subject will be either an INFINITIVE PHRASE (to + verb + other words) or a THAT-CLAUSE.
In the OA, it is standing in for that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.
Conveyed meaning:
That educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technologies can hardly be said.
In other words:
We cannot fault educators for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.
Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even MENTION microcomputers.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:5 members

by RBBmba@2014 » Fri Nov 20, 2015 6:37 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
anksm22 wrote:That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault
(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault
(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology
(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology
(E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said
The correct answer is D.

OA: It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.
Here, it is an EXPLETIVE: a placeholder pronoun serving to DELAY THE SUBJECT.
In most cases, the delayed subject will be either an INFINITIVE PHRASE (to + verb + other words) or a THAT-CLAUSE.
In the OA, it is standing in for that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.
Conveyed meaning:
That educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technologies can hardly be said.
In other words:
We cannot fault educators for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.
Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even MENTION microcomputers.
Hi GMATGuruNY - Apart from the ERRORS you've already mentioned in your post, could you please let me know whether I'm correct in identifying the FOLLOWINGS as potential ERRORS in the INCORRECT answer choices ?

Option A : That educators...can hardly be said that -- UNGRAMMATICAL and nonsensical construction.

Option B : That educators....can hardly be said to be at fault -- it's NOT clear who is/are at fault actually!
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Nov 20, 2015 3:09 pm
RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi GMATGuruNY - Apart from the ERRORS you've already mentioned in your post, could you please let me know whether I'm correct in identifying the FOLLOWINGS as potential ERRORS in the INCORRECT answer choices ?

Option A : That educators...can hardly be said that -- UNGRAMMATICAL and nonsensical construction.
This reasoning is sound.
Option B : That educators....can hardly be said to be at fault -- it's NOT clear who is/are at fault actually!
B: That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault.
Here, the subject of can be said is the that-clause in red, implying that the THAT-CLAUSE can hardly be said to be at fault.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:5 members

by RBBmba@2014 » Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:16 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Option B : That educators....can hardly be said to be at fault -- it's NOT clear who is/are at fault actually!
B: That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault.
Here, the subject of can be said is the that-clause in red, implying that the THAT-CLAUSE can hardly be said to be at fault.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Yes, exactly so...

I actually wanted to mean that from the context we can understand that the intended meaning is EDUCATORS are at FAULT -- NOT "THAT EDUCATORS (THAT-CLAUSE) are at FAULT" (which is obviously nonsensical). Right ?
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Nov 21, 2015 3:23 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Option B : That educators....can hardly be said to be at fault -- it's NOT clear who is/are at fault actually!
B: That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault.
Here, the subject of can be said is the that-clause in red, implying that the THAT-CLAUSE can hardly be said to be at fault.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Yes, exactly so...

I actually wanted to mean that from the context we can understand that the intended meaning is EDUCATORS are at FAULT -- NOT "THAT EDUCATORS (THAT-CLAUSE) are at FAULT" (which is obviously nonsensical). Right ?
Correct!
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1