E stands out to me, since it points there could be other reasons
OA?
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Satellite photograph
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
Call me 1 - (412) 897 6727 (US) or leave a msg on BTG for GMAT advise / questions.
If you like the solution, check out my debrief at and leave a comment:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/760-done-dea ... 66740.html
If you like the solution, check out my debrief at and leave a comment:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/760-done-dea ... 66740.html
i would choose D
hmhmhm its so hard to type without the version of CR right here...
the CR says that deforest decreased a lot this year compare to last year
reason: government spent money to enforce law agaisnt cutting or burning forest... so its law works
D somehow weaken
but B is also weaken, it says much rainfall this year causes decreased in burning the forest by drought and so caused the decrease in deforest
IMO C.
Explanation:
The government claims that its effort on anti-deforestation proved effective consequently decreasing the rate of deforestation.
What if the rate of deforestation continued to be same and some other factor like rains during usual drought/burning season may have added more greenery to forest even when burning and cutting of trees continues?
In my opinion, option C focuses on this point. Thus C.
OA please!
Explanation:
The government claims that its effort on anti-deforestation proved effective consequently decreasing the rate of deforestation.
What if the rate of deforestation continued to be same and some other factor like rains during usual drought/burning season may have added more greenery to forest even when burning and cutting of trees continues?
In my opinion, option C focuses on this point. Thus C.
OA please!
deforestation of tropical rain forest decreased becasue the G enfored a kind of law which forbid to cut and burn trees in the forest.... ( this mean that deforestation is caused by buring or cutting a lot of tree)
conclusion : the law works.
B: the law didnt work because during dry 6 month, it was terribly raining thus no trees ware burnt....
is B the answerr?













