∣(x + 1)/(x - 1)∣ < 4; x ≠1.
What is the solution to the above inequality?
(A) x < 3.5, x > 5.3
(B) x < 3/5, x > 5/3
(C) 3.5 < x < 5.3
(D) 3/5 < x < 5/3
(E) 0 < x < 3/5
the solution to
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
Are you positive that x - 1 is positive?papgust wrote:-4 < x+1/x-1 < 4
-4x+4 < x+1 < 4x-4
-4x+3 < x < 4x-5
3/5 < x < 5/3
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
The answer is B .
x<3/5 and x> 5/3
|(x+1)/(x-1)| < 4.
Case 1 .
(x+1)/(x-1) < 4
x+1 < 4x - 4
5 < 3x
5/3 < x .
Case 2 .
(x+1)/(x-1) > -4
x+1 > 4 - 4x .
-3 > -5x
x < 3/5 .
x<3/5 and x> 5/3
|(x+1)/(x-1)| < 4.
Case 1 .
(x+1)/(x-1) < 4
x+1 < 4x - 4
5 < 3x
5/3 < x .
Case 2 .
(x+1)/(x-1) > -4
x+1 > 4 - 4x .
-3 > -5x
x < 3/5 .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
Why can't we consider squaring both sides in this case?rockeyb wrote:The answer is B .
x<3/5 and x> 5/3
|(x+1)/(x-1)| < 4.
Case 1 .
(x+1)/(x-1) < 4
x+1 < 4x - 4
5 < 3x
5/3 < x.
Case 2 .
(x+1)/(x-1) > -4
x+1 > 4 - 4x .
-3 > -5x
x < 3/5 .
https://www.beatthegmat.com/crucial-doub ... tml#235005
[spoiler]Only 1411 TIGERS LEFT!!!! SAVE TIGERS.
Have they bunged mating too?[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- papgust
- Community Manager
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pm
- Thanked: 653 times
- Followed by:252 members
sanju09 wrote:Are you positive that x - 1 is positive?papgust wrote:-4 < x+1/x-1 < 4
-4x+4 < x+1 < 4x-4
-4x+3 < x < 4x-5
3/5 < x < 5/3
I made a big mistake i guess. I intended to do rockey's approach but turned out something else on the screen. It's time to take some time off
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
sanju09 wrote:Why can't we consider squaring both sides in this case?rockeyb wrote:The answer is B .
x<3/5 and x> 5/3
|(x+1)/(x-1)| < 4.
Case 1 .
(x+1)/(x-1) < 4
x+1 < 4x - 4
5 < 3x
5/3 < x.
Case 2 .
(x+1)/(x-1) > -4
x+1 > 4 - 4x .
-3 > -5x
x < 3/5 .
https://www.beatthegmat.com/crucial-doub ... tml#235005
I don't get it why do you want to square both sides of the inequality ?
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
If you have already gone through the link that I have posted above, then you may realize that squaring both sides is the surest and shortest way of cracking such problems. It sails you out error free too, see what is in bold in your original post. Falling to the right answer by chance cannot be taken generally.rockeyb wrote:I don't get it why do you want to square both sides of the inequality ?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
sanju09 wrote:If you have already gone through the link that I have posted above, then you may realize that squaring both sides is the surest and shortest way of cracking such problems. It sails you out error free too, see what is in bold in your original post. Falling to the right answer by chance cannot be taken generally.rockeyb wrote:I don't get it why do you want to square both sides of the inequality ?
In the post here https://www.beatthegmat.com/crucial-doub ... tml#235005 you have given the answer to your own question .
this is an extract from your last post
As said we do not know the value of X if its +ve or -ve . The only thing we know that X can not be 1.Modulus Inequalities can be worked out by squaring both sides of the inequalities or by means of graphs. It is valuable to note that squaring both sides is legitimate only when both sides of the inequality are either zero or positive for all values of the variable(s) used, or else it is optional to work loose the inequalities using the graphical method.
Now since we do not know what X stands for we have to consider 2 cases one +ve and other -ve . This is because what ever the value of X be (+ve or - ve ) the answer for mod of X will always be X only .
OR we can draw a graph and solve it as you have rightly said.
Lets consider a simpler example :
Q . what is the range of all possible values of |x-2| < 5 ?
As you can see we dont know the value of X here . So X can be any thing +ve or -ve .
Note that if you draw a number line we will have center of line at 2 and not 0 . And if you move 5 units either side of 2 you will have your two extremes that is 7 and -3 .
Same thing can be achieved by solving two cases
1.Right side of number line
x-2 < 5
x < 7
2. Left side of number line
-(x-2) < 5 OR x-2 > -5
x > -3
Now you get your two extremes .
Hope this makes sense .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
It is valuable to note that squaring both sides is legitimate only when both sides of the inequality are either zero or positive for all values of the variable(s) used, or else it is optional to work loose the inequalities using the graphical method
As said we do not know the value of X if its +ve or -ve . The only thing we know that X can not be 1.
I haven't said that the variable(s) must be non-negative for squaring, please read the bold part again.Hope this makes sense .
Also see your following work
Is there any placing mistake? Are you also positive that x - 1 is positive. Squaring both sides saves us from many such irregularities.Case 2 .
(x+1)/(x-1) > -4
x+1 > 4 - 4x .
-3 > -5x
x < 3/5 .
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
surerockeyb wrote:@sanju09
I see your point.
I forgot to flip the inequality sign .
So how do you suggest we solve this ? can u explain?
∣(x + 1)/(x - 1)∣ < 4
both sides squared
(x^2 + 2 x + 1)/ (x^2 - 2 x + 1) < 16
15 x^2 - 34 x + 15 > 0
(3 x - 5) (5 x - 3) > 0
[spoiler]x < 3/5, x > 5/3
B[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
But you too get the same answer .sanju09 wrote:surerockeyb wrote:@sanju09
I see your point.
I forgot to flip the inequality sign .
So how do you suggest we solve this ? can u explain?
∣(x + 1)/(x - 1)∣ < 4
both sides squared
(x^2 + 2 x + 1)/ (x^2 - 2 x + 1) < 16
15 x^2 - 34 x + 15 > 0
(3 x - 5) (5 x - 3) > 0
[spoiler]x < 3/5, x > 5/3
B[/spoiler]
the two roots
1. 3x -5 >0
3x >5
x>5/3
2. 5x -3 >0
5x > 3
x>3/5
So we get x > 3/5 and x > 5/ 3
which eventually mean x > 5/3 .
If you see the two cases I have presented :
Case 1 .
(x+1)/(x-1) < 4
x+1 < 4x - 4
5 < 3x
5/3 < x.
Case 2 .
(x+1)/(x-1) > -4
x+1 > 4 - 4x .
-3 > -5x
x > 3/5 .
we get the exact same result x > 5/3 and x> 3/5 .
And that is not what option B says .
Option B says x> 5/3 and x< 3/5
This can be a typo but none of the option seem to match in this case.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
rockeyb wrote:But you too get the same answer .sanju09 wrote:surerockeyb wrote:@sanju09
I see your point.
I forgot to flip the inequality sign .
So how do you suggest we solve this ? can u explain?
∣(x + 1)/(x - 1)∣ < 4
both sides squared
(x^2 + 2 x + 1)/ (x^2 - 2 x + 1) < 16
15 x^2 - 34 x + 15 > 0
(3 x - 5) (5 x - 3) > 0
[spoiler]x < 3/5, x > 5/3
B[/spoiler]
the two roots
1. 3x -5 >0
3x >5
x>5/3
2. 5x -3 >0
5x > 3
x>3/5
So we get x > 3/5 and x > 5/ 3
which eventually mean x > 5/3 .
If you see the two cases I have presented :
Case 1 .
(x+1)/(x-1) < 4
x+1 < 4x - 4
5 < 3x
5/3 < x.
Case 2 .
(x+1)/(x-1) > -4
x+1 > 4 - 4x .
-3 > -5x
x > 3/5 .
we get the exact same result x > 5/3 and x> 3/5 .
And that is not what option B says .
Option B says x> 5/3 and x< 3/5
This can be a typo but none of the option seem to match in this case.
Please take your time and revise all what you wrote in my contrast
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com