BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Online questions

Expert replies
by Mission2012 » Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:06 pm
Using the average wage of $200 a day to value workers' time, and assuming that people who could ask more questions online would, the analyst estimated the search engine's worth might be approximately $300 annually to the average worker.

A>Using the average wage of $200 a day to value workers' time, and assuming that people who could ask more questions online would, the analyst estimated the search engine's worth might be $300 annually to the average worker.

B> Using the average wage of $200 a day as a value of workers' time and the assumption that people who could ask more questions online would, the analyst estimated the search engine's worth might be $300 annually to the average worker.

C> Assuming the average wage of $200 a day as a value of workers' time and that people who could ask more questions online would, the analyst estimated that the search engine might be worth $300 annually to the average worker.

D> Assuming the average wage of $200 a day as a value of workers' time and the fact that people who could ask more questions online would, the analyst estimated that the search engine might be worth $300 annually to the average worker.

E> Using the average wage of $200 a day as a value of workers' time, and assuming that people who could ask more questions online would, the analyst estimated that the search engine might be worth $300 annually to the average worker.

[spoiler]oa : E[/spoiler] Though i find A better than E
If you find my post useful -> please click on "Thanks"
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by vinay1983 » Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:30 pm
OA E.My method is as below:

I could find multiple 3/2 splits here.

"Assuming the average" and "Using the average"

"and assuming that people" and "and the assumption that people"

"estimated that the search engine might be worth $300 annually to the average worker" and "estimated the search engine's worth might be $300 annually to the average worker"

So "estimated the search engine's worth might be(wrong) to be(correct) $300 annually to the average worker" needs "to be"



A and B are out.

In option E "and assuming that people" is correct usage when compared with C and D.

Further the analyst estimated something using something not assuming something.

I have a query though:

The "when" in bold plays a role of...? here (I have seen "when" to be used to refer to time)
Also can't somebody assume something and then estimate?
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1